| | | | | | |

Core i9-9900K vs i7-1195G7


Description
The i9-9900K is based on Coffee Lake architecture while the i7-1195G7 is based on Tiger Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i9-9900K gets a score of 545.3 k points while the i7-1195G7 gets 239.6 k points.

Summarizing, the i9-9900K is 2.3 times faster than the i7-1195G7. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
906ec
806c2
Core
Coffee Lake-S
Tiger Lake UP3
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
2.9 GHz
Boost frecuency
5 GHz
5 GHz
Socket
LGA 1151
BGA 1499
Cores/Threads
8/16
4/8
TDP
95 W
28 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
4x32+4x48 kB
Cache L2
8x256 kB
4x1280 kB
Cache L3
16384 kB
12288 kB
Date
October 2018
May 2021
Mean monothread perf.
86.24k points
82.77k points
Mean multithread perf.
545.3k points
239.58k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i9-9900K
i7-1195G7
Test#1 (Integers)
5.17k
4.57k (x0.88)
Test#2 (FP)
21.15k
17.21k (x0.81)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.01k
9.97k (x1.42)
Test#1 (Memory)
15.32k
14.98k (x0.98)
TOTAL
48.66k
46.75k (x0.96)

Multithread

i9-9900K

i7-1195G7
Test#1 (Integers)
38.45k
12.75k (x0.33)
Test#2 (FP)
155.68k
45.98k (x0.3)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
51k
27.86k (x0.55)
Test#1 (Memory)
18.26k
20.06k (x1.1)
TOTAL
263.38k
106.66k (x0.4)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i9-9900K
i7-1195G7
Test#1 (Integers)
33.62k
30.89k (x0.92)
Test#2 (FP)
30.02k
25.57k (x0.85)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.17k
10.64k (x1.48)
Test#1 (Memory)
15.43k
15.66k (x1.01)
TOTAL
86.24k
82.77k (x0.96)

Multithread

i9-9900K

i7-1195G7
Test#1 (Integers)
248.93k
96.34k (x0.39)
Test#2 (FP)
224.43k
95.75k (x0.43)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
53.39k
32.29k (x0.6)
Test#1 (Memory)
18.54k
15.2k (x0.82)
TOTAL
545.3k
239.58k (x0.44)

Performance/W
i9-9900K
i7-1195G7
Test#1 (Integers)
2620 points/W
3441 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2362 points/W
3420 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
562 points/W
1153 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
195 points/W
543 points/W
TOTAL
5740 points/W
8557 points/W

Performance/GHz
i9-9900K
i7-1195G7
Test#1 (Integers)
6724 points/GHz
6179 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
6003 points/GHz
5115 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1434 points/GHz
2128 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3087 points/GHz
3133 points/GHz
TOTAL
17247 points/GHz
16555 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4