Core i9-7980XE vs i7-10700
Description
The i9-7980XE is based on Skylake architecture while the i7-10700 is based on Comet Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i9-7980XE gets a score of 1223.8 k points while the i7-10700 gets 537.7 k points.
Summarizing, the i9-7980XE is 2.3 times faster than the i7-10700. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i9-7980XE gets a score of 1223.8 k points while the i7-10700 gets 537.7 k points.
Summarizing, the i9-7980XE is 2.3 times faster than the i7-10700. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
50654
a0655
Core
Skylake-X
Comet Lake-S
Base frecuency
2.6 GHz
2.9 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.4 GHz
4.8 GHz
Socket
LGA 2066
LGA 1200
Cores/Threads
18/36
8/16
TDP
165 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
18x32+18x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
18x1024 kB
8x256 kB
Cache L3
25344 kB
16386 kB
Date
May 2017
April 2020
Mean monothread perf.
76.43k points
74.53k points
Mean multithread perf.
1223.79k points
537.73k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i9-7980XE
i7-10700
Test#1 (Integers)
31.16k
30.66k (x0.98)
Test#2 (FP)
28.13k
25.64k (x0.91)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.65k
5.98k (x0.9)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.5k
12.25k (x1.17)
TOTAL
76.43k
74.53k (x0.98)
Multithread
i9-7980XE
i7-10700
Test#1 (Integers)
560.19k
240.28k (x0.43)
Test#2 (FP)
516.97k
234.3k (x0.45)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
123.94k
56.12k (x0.45)
Test#1 (Memory)
22.69k
7.02k (x0.31)
TOTAL
1223.79k
537.73k (x0.44)
Performance/W
i9-7980XE
i7-10700
Test#1 (Integers)
3395 points/W
3697 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3133 points/W
3605 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
751 points/W
863 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
137 points/W
108 points/W
TOTAL
7417 points/W
8273 points/W
Performance/GHz
i9-7980XE
i7-10700
Test#1 (Integers)
7081 points/GHz
6388 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
6392 points/GHz
5341 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1512 points/GHz
1245 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2386 points/GHz
2553 points/GHz
TOTAL
17371 points/GHz
15527 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4