Core i9-10980XE vs i7-10700
Description
The i9-10980XE is based on Cascade Lake architecture while the i7-10700 is based on Comet Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i9-10980XE gets a score of 1241.1 k points while the i7-10700 gets 537.7 k points.
Summarizing, the i9-10980XE is 2.3 times faster than the i7-10700. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i9-10980XE gets a score of 1241.1 k points while the i7-10700 gets 537.7 k points.
Summarizing, the i9-10980XE is 2.3 times faster than the i7-10700. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
50657
a0655
Core
Cascade Lake-X
Comet Lake-S
Base frecuency
3 GHz
2.9 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.8 GHz
4.8 GHz
Socket
LGA 2066
LGA 1200
Cores/Threads
18/36
8/16
TDP
165 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
18x32+18x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
18x1024 kB
8x256 kB
Cache L3
25344 kB
16386 kB
Date
November 2019
April 2020
Mean monothread perf.
68.33k points
74.53k points
Mean multithread perf.
1241.12k points
537.73k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i9-10980XE
i7-10700
Test#1 (Integers)
29.53k
30.66k (x1.04)
Test#2 (FP)
22.59k
25.64k (x1.13)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.99k
5.98k (x1)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.22k
12.25k (x1.2)
TOTAL
68.33k
74.53k (x1.09)
Multithread
i9-10980XE
i7-10700
Test#1 (Integers)
587.06k
240.28k (x0.41)
Test#2 (FP)
496.41k
234.3k (x0.47)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
134.66k
56.12k (x0.42)
Test#1 (Memory)
22.99k
7.02k (x0.31)
TOTAL
1241.12k
537.73k (x0.43)
Performance/W
i9-10980XE
i7-10700
Test#1 (Integers)
3558 points/W
3697 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3009 points/W
3605 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
816 points/W
863 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
139 points/W
108 points/W
TOTAL
7522 points/W
8273 points/W
Performance/GHz
i9-10980XE
i7-10700
Test#1 (Integers)
6153 points/GHz
6388 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4707 points/GHz
5341 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1248 points/GHz
1245 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2129 points/GHz
2553 points/GHz
TOTAL
14236 points/GHz
15527 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4