Core i9-10980XE vs Ryzen 9 7940HS
Description
The i9-10980XE is based on Cascade Lake architecture while the 7940HS is based on Zen 4.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i9-10980XE gets a score of 1241.1 k points while the 7940HS gets 718.6 k points.
Summarizing, the i9-10980XE is 1.7 times faster than the 7940HS. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i9-10980XE gets a score of 1241.1 k points while the 7940HS gets 718.6 k points.
Summarizing, the i9-10980XE is 1.7 times faster than the 7940HS. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
50657
a70f41
Core
Cascade Lake-X
Phoenix
Base frecuency
3 GHz
4 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.8 GHz
5.2 GHz
Socket
LGA 2066
BGA-FP7r2
Cores/Threads
18/36
8/16
TDP
165 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
18x32+18x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
18x1024 kB
8x1024 kB
Cache L3
25344 kB
16384 kB
Date
November 2019
March 2023
Mean monothread perf.
68.33k points
113.57k points
Mean multithread perf.
1241.12k points
718.59k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i9-10980XE
7940HS
Test#1 (Integers)
29.53k
38.25k (x1.3)
Test#2 (FP)
22.59k
29.92k (x1.32)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.99k
15.5k (x2.59)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.22k
29.89k (x2.93)
TOTAL
68.33k
113.57k (x1.66)
Multithread
i9-10980XE
7940HS
Test#1 (Integers)
587.06k
309.6k (x0.53)
Test#2 (FP)
496.41k
260.4k (x0.52)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
134.66k
128.56k (x0.95)
Test#1 (Memory)
22.99k
20.04k (x0.87)
TOTAL
1241.12k
718.59k (x0.58)
Performance/W
i9-10980XE
7940HS
Test#1 (Integers)
3558 points/W
8846 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3009 points/W
7440 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
816 points/W
3673 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
139 points/W
573 points/W
TOTAL
7522 points/W
20531 points/W
Performance/GHz
i9-10980XE
7940HS
Test#1 (Integers)
6153 points/GHz
7355 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4707 points/GHz
5755 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1248 points/GHz
2981 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2129 points/GHz
5748 points/GHz
TOTAL
14236 points/GHz
21839 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4