Core i9-10900K vs Ryzen 9 7940HS
Description
The i9-10900K is based on Comet Lake architecture while the 7940HS is based on Zen 4.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i9-10900K gets a score of 685.6 k points while the 7940HS gets 718.6 k points.
Summarizing, the 7940HS is 1 times faster than the i9-10900K. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i9-10900K gets a score of 685.6 k points while the 7940HS gets 718.6 k points.
Summarizing, the 7940HS is 1 times faster than the i9-10900K. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a0655
a70f41
Core
Comet Lake-S
Phoenix
Base frecuency
3.7 GHz
4 GHz
Boost frecuency
5.2 GHz
5.2 GHz
Socket
LGA 1200
BGA-FP7r2
Cores/Threads
10/20
8/16
TDP
125 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
10x32+10x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
10x256 kB
8x1024 kB
Cache L3
20480 kB
16384 kB
Date
April 2020
March 2023
Mean monothread perf.
80.41k points
113.57k points
Mean multithread perf.
685.65k points
718.59k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i9-10900K
7940HS
Test#1 (Integers)
32.67k
38.25k (x1.17)
Test#2 (FP)
28.49k
29.92k (x1.05)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.53k
15.5k (x2.37)
Test#1 (Memory)
12.72k
29.89k (x2.35)
TOTAL
80.41k
113.57k (x1.41)
Multithread
i9-10900K
7940HS
Test#1 (Integers)
307.39k
309.6k (x1.01)
Test#2 (FP)
298.47k
260.4k (x0.87)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
72.94k
128.56k (x1.76)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.85k
20.04k (x2.92)
TOTAL
685.65k
718.59k (x1.05)
Performance/W
i9-10900K
7940HS
Test#1 (Integers)
2459 points/W
8846 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2388 points/W
7440 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
583 points/W
3673 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
55 points/W
573 points/W
TOTAL
5485 points/W
20531 points/W
Performance/GHz
i9-10900K
7940HS
Test#1 (Integers)
6282 points/GHz
7355 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5479 points/GHz
5755 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1257 points/GHz
2981 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2445 points/GHz
5748 points/GHz
TOTAL
15463 points/GHz
21839 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4