| | | | | | |

Core i7-860 vs i5-7200U


Description
The i7-860 is based on Nehalem architecture while the i5-7200U is based on Kaby Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-860 gets a score of 70.7 k points while the i5-7200U gets 75.9 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-7200U is 1.1 times faster than the i7-860 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
106e5
806e9
Core
Lynnfield
Kaby Lake-U
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.8 GHz
2.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.467 GHz
3.1 GHz
Socket
LGA 1156
BGA1356
Cores/Threads
4/8
2/4
TDP
95 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
3072 kB
Date
September 2009
August 2016
Mean monothread perf.
19.07k points
44.94k points
Mean multithread perf.
70.68k points
97.52k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i7-860
i5-7200U
Test#1 (Integers)
2.15k
3.15k (x1.47)
Test#2 (FP)
4.87k
12.85k (x2.64)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.82k
4.14k (x1.47)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.13k
5.21k (x1.67)
TOTAL
12.97k
25.36k (x1.96)

Multithread

i7-860

i5-7200U
Test#1 (Integers)
8.24k
6.28k (x0.76)
Test#2 (FP)
21.63k
29.27k (x1.35)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
14.65k
9.31k (x0.64)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.02k
4.71k (x0.94)
TOTAL
49.54k
49.56k (x1)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i7-860
i5-7200U
Test#1 (Integers)
7.83k
11.39k (x1.45)
Test#2 (FP)
5.23k
16.47k (x3.15)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.91k
4.36k (x1.5)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.09k
5.21k (x1.68)
TOTAL
19.07k
37.43k (x1.96)

Multithread

i7-860

i5-7200U
Test#1 (Integers)
29.29k
23.57k (x0.8)
Test#2 (FP)
22.75k
37.4k (x1.64)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
14.04k
10.15k (x0.72)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.6k
4.78k (x1.04)
TOTAL
70.68k
75.9k (x1.07)

Performance/W
i7-860
i5-7200U
Test#1 (Integers)
308 points/W
1572 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
240 points/W
2493 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
148 points/W
677 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
48 points/W
319 points/W
TOTAL
744 points/W
5060 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-860
i5-7200U
Test#1 (Integers)
2259 points/GHz
3674 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1509 points/GHz
5313 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
839 points/GHz
1406 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
892 points/GHz
1680 points/GHz
TOTAL
5500 points/GHz
12073 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4