| | | | | | |

Core i7-8700 vs Pentium G3260


Description
The i7-8700 is based on Coffee Lake architecture while the G3260 is based on Haswell.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-8700 gets a score of 310.2 k points while the G3260 gets 58.9 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-8700 is 5.3 times faster than the G3260. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
906ea
306c3
Core
Coffee Lake-S
Haswell
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.2 GHz
3.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.6 GHz
3.3 GHz
Socket
LGA 1151
LGA1150
Cores/Threads
6/12
2/2
TDP
65 W
53 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
3072 kB
Date
October 2017
March 2015
Mean monothread perf.
75.01k points
30.56k points
Mean multithread perf.
388.95k points
58.89k points

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i7-8700
G3260
Test#1 (Integers)
16.45k
11.73k (x0.71)
Test#2 (FP)
23.74k
10.45k (x0.44)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.24k
4.55k (x0.73)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.43k
3.83k (x0.29)
TOTAL
59.86k
30.56k (x0.51)

Multithread

i7-8700

G3260
Test#1 (Integers)
100.94k
22.99k (x0.23)
Test#2 (FP)
159.09k
20.53k (x0.13)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
43.61k
8.82k (x0.2)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.59k
6.55k (x0.99)
TOTAL
310.23k
58.89k (x0.19)

Performance/W
i7-8700
G3260
Test#1 (Integers)
1553 points/W
434 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2447 points/W
387 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
671 points/W
166 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
101 points/W
124 points/W
TOTAL
4773 points/W
1111 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-8700
G3260
Test#1 (Integers)
3577 points/GHz
3555 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5160 points/GHz
3165 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1357 points/GHz
1380 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2921 points/GHz
1161 points/GHz
TOTAL
13014 points/GHz
9261 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4