| | | | | | |

Core i7-7700HQ vs i5-1335U


Description
The i7-7700HQ is based on Kaby Lake architecture while the i5-1335U is based on Raptor Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-7700HQ gets a score of 208.3 k points while the i5-1335U gets 282.2 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-1335U is 1.4 times faster than the i7-7700HQ. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
906e9
b06a3
Core
Kaby Lake-H
Raptor Lake-U
Architecture
Kaby Lake
Base frecuency
2.8 GHz
1.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.8 GHz
4.6 GHz
Socket
BGA1440
BGA 1744
Cores/Threads
4/8
10/12
TDP
45 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
2x32/8x64+2x48/8x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
2x1280/2x2048 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
12288 kB
Date
January 2017
January 2023
Mean monothread perf.
56.29k points
92.46k points
Mean multithread perf.
208.33k points
282.25k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-7700HQ
i5-1335U
Test#1 (Integers)
23.27k
37.94k (x1.63)
Test#2 (FP)
20.35k
26.18k (x1.29)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.76k
13.86k (x2.91)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.92k
14.48k (x1.83)
TOTAL
56.29k
92.46k (x1.64)

Multithread

i7-7700HQ

i5-1335U
Test#1 (Integers)
93.11k
125.7k (x1.35)
Test#2 (FP)
89.03k
93.63k (x1.05)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
21.29k
46.18k (x2.17)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.9k
16.75k (x3.42)
TOTAL
208.33k
282.25k (x1.35)

Performance/W
i7-7700HQ
i5-1335U
Test#1 (Integers)
2069 points/W
8380 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1978 points/W
6242 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
473 points/W
3079 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
109 points/W
1117 points/W
TOTAL
4629 points/W
18817 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-7700HQ
i5-1335U
Test#1 (Integers)
6124 points/GHz
8248 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5354 points/GHz
5692 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1251 points/GHz
3013 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2083 points/GHz
3147 points/GHz
TOTAL
14813 points/GHz
20100 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4