| | | | | | |

Core i7-7560U vs i5-4670K


Description
The i7-7560U is based on Kaby Lake architecture while the i5-4670K is based on Haswell.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-7560U gets a score of 97.3 k points while the i5-4670K gets 140.2 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-4670K is 1.4 times faster than the i7-7560U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
806e9
306c3
Core
Kaby Lake-U
Haswell
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.4 GHz
3.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.8 GHz
3.8 GHz
Socket
BGA 1356
LGA 1150
Cores/Threads
2/4
4/4
TDP
15 W
84 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
6144 kB
Date
January 2017
June 2013
Mean monothread perf.
48.16k points
42.25k points
Mean multithread perf.
97.27k points
140.18k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-7560U
i5-4670K
Test#1 (Integers)
19.37k
21.79k (x1.13)
Test#2 (FP)
17.26k
11.49k (x0.67)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.78k
4.73k (x1.25)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.75k
4.25k (x0.55)
TOTAL
48.16k
42.25k (x0.88)

Multithread

i7-7560U

i5-4670K
Test#1 (Integers)
39.17k
75.9k (x1.94)
Test#2 (FP)
38.24k
40.88k (x1.07)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.9k
17.08k (x1.92)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.97k
6.32k (x0.58)
TOTAL
97.27k
140.18k (x1.44)

Performance/W
i7-7560U
i5-4670K
Test#1 (Integers)
2611 points/W
904 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2549 points/W
487 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
593 points/W
203 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
731 points/W
75 points/W
TOTAL
6485 points/W
1669 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-7560U
i5-4670K
Test#1 (Integers)
5097 points/GHz
5735 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4543 points/GHz
3023 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
994 points/GHz
1244 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2041 points/GHz
1117 points/GHz
TOTAL
12674 points/GHz
11120 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4