| | | | | | |

Core i7-6900K vs i5-1035G1


Description
The i7-6900K is based on Broadwell architecture while the i5-1035G1 is based on Ice Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-6900K gets a score of 427.5 k points while the i5-1035G1 gets 171.6 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-6900K is 2.5 times faster than the i5-1035G1. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
406f1
706e5
Core
Broadwell-E
Ice Lake-U
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.2 GHz
1 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.7 GHz
3.6 GHz
Socket
LGA 2011-3
BGA 1526
Cores/Threads
8/16
4/8
TDP
140 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
4x32+4x48 kB
Cache L2
8x256 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
20480 kB
6144 kB
Date
September 2016
August 2019
Mean monothread perf.
49.76k points
55.37k points
Mean multithread perf.
427.51k points
171.65k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-6900K
i5-1035G1
Test#1 (Integers)
23.11k
21.5k (x0.93)
Test#2 (FP)
17.84k
17.71k (x0.99)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.34k
7.92k (x1.48)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.47k
8.24k (x2.38)
TOTAL
49.76k
55.37k (x1.11)

Multithread

i7-6900K

i5-1035G1
Test#1 (Integers)
184.19k
73.03k (x0.4)
Test#2 (FP)
181.2k
68.19k (x0.38)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
47.44k
24.89k (x0.52)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.69k
5.54k (x0.38)
TOTAL
427.51k
171.65k (x0.4)

Performance/W
i7-6900K
i5-1035G1
Test#1 (Integers)
1316 points/W
4869 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1294 points/W
4546 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
339 points/W
1660 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
105 points/W
369 points/W
TOTAL
3054 points/W
11443 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-6900K
i5-1035G1
Test#1 (Integers)
6247 points/GHz
5972 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4822 points/GHz
4919 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1444 points/GHz
2201 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
938 points/GHz
2290 points/GHz
TOTAL
13450 points/GHz
15381 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4