Core i7-5960X vs i5-1038NG7
Description
The i7-5960X is based on Haswell architecture while the i5-1038NG7 is based on Ice Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-5960X gets a score of 294.3 k points while the i5-1038NG7 gets 243.2 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-5960X is 1.2 times faster than the i5-1038NG7. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-5960X gets a score of 294.3 k points while the i5-1038NG7 gets 243.2 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-5960X is 1.2 times faster than the i5-1038NG7. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
306f2
706e5
Core
Haswell-E
Ice Lake-U
Base frecuency
3 GHz
2 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.5 GHz
3.8 GHz
Socket
LGA 1150
FCBGA1344
Cores/Threads
8/16
4/8
TDP
140 W
28 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
4x32+4x48 kB
Cache L2
8x256 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
20480 kB
6144 kB
Date
September 2014
May 2020
Mean monothread perf.
13.16k points
65.35k points
Mean multithread perf.
294.29k points
243.18k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-5960X
i5-1038NG7
Test#1 (Integers)
6.6k
23.2k (x3.51)
Test#2 (FP)
3.8k
21.2k (x5.58)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1.41k
9.4k (x6.67)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.34k
11.54k (x8.59)
TOTAL
13.16k
65.35k (x4.97)
Multithread
i7-5960X
i5-1038NG7
Test#1 (Integers)
146.65k
94.68k (x0.65)
Test#2 (FP)
100.72k
103.38k (x1.03)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
34.09k
35.79k (x1.05)
Test#1 (Memory)
12.83k
9.33k (x0.73)
TOTAL
294.29k
243.18k (x0.83)
Performance/W
i7-5960X
i5-1038NG7
Test#1 (Integers)
1047 points/W
3381 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
719 points/W
3692 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
243 points/W
1278 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
92 points/W
333 points/W
TOTAL
2102 points/W
8685 points/W
Performance/GHz
i7-5960X
i5-1038NG7
Test#1 (Integers)
1887 points/GHz
6106 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1086 points/GHz
5580 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
403 points/GHz
2473 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
384 points/GHz
3037 points/GHz
TOTAL
3759 points/GHz
17197 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4