Core i7-5960X vs Ryzen 5 2400G
Description
The i7-5960X is based on Haswell architecture while the 2400G is based on Zen.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-5960X gets a score of 294.3 k points while the 2400G gets 198.3 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-5960X is 1.5 times faster than the 2400G. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-5960X gets a score of 294.3 k points while the 2400G gets 198.3 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-5960X is 1.5 times faster than the 2400G. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
306f2
810f10
Core
Haswell-E
Raven Ridge
Base frecuency
3 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.5 GHz
3.9 GHz
Socket
LGA 1150
AM4
Cores/Threads
8/16
4/8
TDP
140 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
4x64+4x32 kB
Cache L2
8x256 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
20480 kB
4096 kB
Date
September 2014
January 2018
Mean monothread perf.
13.16k points
47.96k points
Mean multithread perf.
294.29k points
198.27k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-5960X
2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
6.6k
14.2k (x2.15)
Test#2 (FP)
3.8k
23.23k (x6.11)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1.41k
5.35k (x3.8)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.34k
5.18k (x3.85)
TOTAL
13.16k
47.96k (x3.65)
Multithread
i7-5960X
2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
146.65k
58.24k (x0.4)
Test#2 (FP)
100.72k
105.72k (x1.05)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
34.09k
28.73k (x0.84)
Test#1 (Memory)
12.83k
5.59k (x0.44)
TOTAL
294.29k
198.27k (x0.67)
Performance/W
i7-5960X
2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
1047 points/W
896 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
719 points/W
1626 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
243 points/W
442 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
92 points/W
86 points/W
TOTAL
2102 points/W
3050 points/W
Performance/GHz
i7-5960X
2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
1887 points/GHz
3641 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1086 points/GHz
5957 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
403 points/GHz
1372 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
384 points/GHz
1327 points/GHz
TOTAL
3759 points/GHz
12298 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4