Core i7-5960X vs A10 9630P
Description
The i7-5960X is based on Haswell architecture while the 9630P is based on Excavator.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-5960X gets a score of 294.3 k points while the 9630P gets 32.9 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-5960X is 8.9 times faster than the 9630P. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-5960X gets a score of 294.3 k points while the 9630P gets 32.9 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-5960X is 8.9 times faster than the 9630P. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
306f2
660f51
Core
Haswell-E
Bristol Ridge
Base frecuency
3 GHz
2.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.5 GHz
3.3 GHz
Socket
LGA 1150
Socket FP4
Cores/Threads
8/16
4/4
TDP
140 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
2x96+4x32 kB
Cache L2
8x256 kB
2x1024 kB
Cache L3
20480 kB
0 kB
Date
September 2014
June 2016
Mean monothread perf.
13.16k points
23.7k points
Mean multithread perf.
294.29k points
32.92k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-5960X
9630P
Test#1 (Integers)
6.6k
8.52k (x1.29)
Test#2 (FP)
3.8k
11.04k (x2.9)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1.41k
2.36k (x1.67)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.34k
1.79k (x1.33)
TOTAL
13.16k
23.7k (x1.8)
Multithread
i7-5960X
9630P
Test#1 (Integers)
146.65k
12.83k (x0.09)
Test#2 (FP)
100.72k
14.44k (x0.14)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
34.09k
3.6k (x0.11)
Test#1 (Memory)
12.83k
2.05k (x0.16)
TOTAL
294.29k
32.92k (x0.11)
Performance/W
i7-5960X
9630P
Test#1 (Integers)
1047 points/W
285 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
719 points/W
321 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
243 points/W
80 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
92 points/W
46 points/W
TOTAL
2102 points/W
732 points/W
Performance/GHz
i7-5960X
9630P
Test#1 (Integers)
1887 points/GHz
2582 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1086 points/GHz
3344 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
403 points/GHz
714 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
384 points/GHz
543 points/GHz
TOTAL
3759 points/GHz
7183 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4