Core i7-5960X vs i9-11900H
Description
The i7-5960X is based on Haswell architecture while the i9-11900H is based on Tiger Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-5960X gets a score of 294.3 k points while the i9-11900H gets 584.5 k points.
Summarizing, the i9-11900H is 2 times faster than the i7-5960X . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-5960X gets a score of 294.3 k points while the i9-11900H gets 584.5 k points.
Summarizing, the i9-11900H is 2 times faster than the i7-5960X . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
306f2
806d1
Core
Haswell-E
Tiger Lake-H
Base frecuency
3 GHz
2.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.5 GHz
4.9 GHz
Socket
LGA 1150
BGA 1787
Cores/Threads
8/16
8/16
TDP
140 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
8x32+8x48 kB
Cache L2
8x256 kB
8x1280 kB
Cache L3
20480 kB
24576 kB
Date
September 2014
May 2021
Mean monothread perf.
13.16k points
89.19k points
Mean multithread perf.
294.29k points
584.47k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-5960X
i9-11900H
Test#1 (Integers)
6.6k
33.38k (x5.05)
Test#2 (FP)
3.8k
27.12k (x7.14)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1.41k
11.69k (x8.3)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.34k
17k (x12.65)
TOTAL
13.16k
89.19k (x6.78)
Multithread
i7-5960X
i9-11900H
Test#1 (Integers)
146.65k
249.83k (x1.7)
Test#2 (FP)
100.72k
237.26k (x2.36)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
34.09k
84.18k (x2.47)
Test#1 (Memory)
12.83k
13.2k (x1.03)
TOTAL
294.29k
584.47k (x1.99)
Performance/W
i7-5960X
i9-11900H
Test#1 (Integers)
1047 points/W
5552 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
719 points/W
5272 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
243 points/W
1871 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
92 points/W
293 points/W
TOTAL
2102 points/W
12988 points/W
Performance/GHz
i7-5960X
i9-11900H
Test#1 (Integers)
1887 points/GHz
6812 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1086 points/GHz
5535 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
403 points/GHz
2386 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
384 points/GHz
3469 points/GHz
TOTAL
3759 points/GHz
18202 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4