Core i7-5820K vs Ryzen 7 1700X
Description
The i7-5820K is based on Haswell architecture while the 1700X is based on Zen.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-5820K gets a score of 129.1 k points while the 1700X gets 313.8 k points.
Summarizing, the 1700X is 2.4 times faster than the i7-5820K . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-5820K gets a score of 129.1 k points while the 1700X gets 313.8 k points.
Summarizing, the 1700X is 2.4 times faster than the i7-5820K . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
306f2
800f11
Core
Haswell-E
Summit Ridge
Base frecuency
3.3 GHz
3.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.6 GHz
3.8 GHz
Socket
LGA 1150
AM4
Cores/Threads
6/12
8/16
TDP
140 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
8x64+8x32 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
15360 kB
2x8192 kB
Date
September 2014
March 2017
Mean monothread perf.
31.53k points
56.76k points
Mean multithread perf.
129.06k points
372.73k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i7-5820K
1700X
Test#1 (Integers)
12.03k
12.5k (x1.04)
Test#2 (FP)
11.23k
22.92k (x2.04)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.55k
5.45k (x1.2)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.72k
14.72k (x3.96)
TOTAL
31.53k
55.59k (x1.76)
Multithread
i7-5820K
1700X
Test#1 (Integers)
49.48k
92.51k (x1.87)
Test#2 (FP)
52.21k
144.76k (x2.77)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
19.7k
54.43k (x2.76)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.67k
22.08k (x2.88)
TOTAL
129.06k
313.78k (x2.43)
Performance/W
i7-5820K
1700X
Test#1 (Integers)
353 points/W
974 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
373 points/W
1524 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
141 points/W
573 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
55 points/W
232 points/W
TOTAL
922 points/W
3303 points/W
Performance/GHz
i7-5820K
1700X
Test#1 (Integers)
3343 points/GHz
3289 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3119 points/GHz
6031 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1264 points/GHz
1435 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1033 points/GHz
3875 points/GHz
TOTAL
8759 points/GHz
14629 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4