| | | | | | |

Core i7-4790K vs i5-10400F


Description
The i7-4790K is based on Haswell architecture while the i5-10400F is based on Comet Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-4790K gets a score of 215.5 k points while the i5-10400F gets 369 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-10400F is 1.7 times faster than the i7-4790K . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
306c3
a0653
Core
Haswell
Comet Lake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
4 GHz
2.9 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.4 GHz
4.3 GHz
Socket
LGA 1150
LGA 1200
Cores/Threads
4/8
6/12
TDP
88 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
32+32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
256 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
12288 kB
Date
May 2014
April 2020
Mean monothread perf.
52.47k points
68.02k points
Mean multithread perf.
215.47k points
369.01k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i7-4790K
i5-10400F
Test#1 (Integers)
5.06k
4.3k (x0.85)
Test#2 (FP)
12.63k
16.56k (x1.31)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.81k
5.25k (x0.9)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.96k
12.61k (x2.54)
TOTAL
28.47k
38.72k (x1.36)

Multithread

i7-4790K

i5-10400F
Test#1 (Integers)
18.28k
18.1k (x0.99)
Test#2 (FP)
64.07k
79.16k (x1.24)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
27.52k
26.75k (x0.97)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.97k
13.81k (x1.73)
TOTAL
117.84k
137.82k (x1.17)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-4790K
i5-10400F
Test#1 (Integers)
26.16k
26.29k (x1)
Test#2 (FP)
14.78k
23.38k (x1.58)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.01k
5.51k (x0.92)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.52k
12.84k (x2.33)
TOTAL
52.47k
68.02k (x1.3)

Multithread

i7-4790K

i5-10400F
Test#1 (Integers)
107.76k
163.37k (x1.52)
Test#2 (FP)
70.84k
159.38k (x2.25)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
27.99k
38.87k (x1.39)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.87k
7.39k (x0.83)
TOTAL
215.47k
369.01k (x1.71)

Performance/W
i7-4790K
i5-10400F
Test#1 (Integers)
1225 points/W
2513 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
805 points/W
2452 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
318 points/W
598 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
101 points/W
114 points/W
TOTAL
2448 points/W
5677 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-4790K
i5-10400F
Test#1 (Integers)
5946 points/GHz
6113 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3359 points/GHz
5437 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1366 points/GHz
1282 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1254 points/GHz
2987 points/GHz
TOTAL
11925 points/GHz
15819 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4