| | | | | | |

Core i7-4765T vs Ryzen 5 3600


Description
The i7-4765T is based on Haswell architecture while the 3600 is based on Zen 2.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-4765T gets a score of 134.5 k points while the 3600 gets 348.4 k points.

Summarizing, the 3600 is 2.6 times faster than the i7-4765T . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
306c3
870f10
Core
Haswell
Matisse
Architecture
Base frecuency
2 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
3 GHz
4.2 GHz
Socket
LGA 1150
AM4
Cores/Threads
4/8
6/12
TDP
35 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
32768 kB
Date
May 2013
July 2019
Mean monothread perf.
31.31k points
70.55k points
Mean multithread perf.
134.53k points
348.35k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-4765T
3600
Test#1 (Integers)
15.61k
16.04k (x1.03)
Test#2 (FP)
8.8k
24.47k (x2.78)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.58k
8.38k (x2.34)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.33k
21.66k (x6.51)
TOTAL
31.31k
70.55k (x2.25)

Multithread

i7-4765T

3600
Test#1 (Integers)
66k
113.63k (x1.72)
Test#2 (FP)
43.27k
143.55k (x3.32)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
17.39k
63.84k (x3.67)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.88k
27.34k (x3.47)
TOTAL
134.53k
348.35k (x2.59)

Performance/W
i7-4765T
3600
Test#1 (Integers)
1886 points/W
1748 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1236 points/W
2208 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
497 points/W
982 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
225 points/W
421 points/W
TOTAL
3844 points/W
5359 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-4765T
3600
Test#1 (Integers)
5203 points/GHz
3819 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2932 points/GHz
5825 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1193 points/GHz
1995 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1110 points/GHz
5158 points/GHz
TOTAL
10438 points/GHz
16797 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4