| | | | | | |

Core i7-4720HQ vs Ryzen 9 5950X


Description
The i7-4720HQ is based on Haswell architecture while the 5950X is based on Zen 3.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-4720HQ gets a score of 132.3 k points while the 5950X gets 1060.6 k points.

Summarizing, the 5950X is 8 times faster than the i7-4720HQ. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
306c3
a20f12
Core
Haswell
Vermeer
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.6 GHz
3.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.6 GHz
4.9 GHz
Socket
BGA1364
AM4
Cores/Threads
4/8
16/32
TDP
47 W
105 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
16x32+16x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
16x512 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
2x32768 kB
Date
January 2015
November 2020
Mean monothread perf.
40.12k points
79.51k points
Mean multithread perf.
132.35k points
1060.62k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-4720HQ
5950X
Test#1 (Integers)
20.68k
19.88k (x0.96)
Test#2 (FP)
10.28k
25.26k (x2.46)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.87k
10.77k (x2.21)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.29k
23.59k (x5.5)
TOTAL
40.12k
79.51k (x1.98)

Multithread

i7-4720HQ

5950X
Test#1 (Integers)
66.84k
349.53k (x5.23)
Test#2 (FP)
42.85k
470.67k (x10.98)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
16.77k
207.28k (x12.36)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.88k
33.13k (x5.63)
TOTAL
132.35k
1060.62k (x8.01)

Performance/W
i7-4720HQ
5950X
Test#1 (Integers)
1422 points/W
3329 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
912 points/W
4483 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
357 points/W
1974 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
125 points/W
316 points/W
TOTAL
2816 points/W
10101 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-4720HQ
5950X
Test#1 (Integers)
5745 points/GHz
4058 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2856 points/GHz
5155 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1352 points/GHz
2198 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1191 points/GHz
4815 points/GHz
TOTAL
11143 points/GHz
16226 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4