Core i7-4710HQ vs i5-10210U
Description
The i7-4710HQ is based on Haswell architecture while the i5-10210U is based on Comet Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-4710HQ gets a score of 155.2 k points while the i5-10210U gets 145.5 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-4710HQ is 1.1 times faster than the i5-10210U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-4710HQ gets a score of 155.2 k points while the i5-10210U gets 145.5 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-4710HQ is 1.1 times faster than the i5-10210U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
306c3
806ec
Core
Haswell
Comet Lake-U
Base frecuency
2.5 GHz
1.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.5 GHz
4.2 GHz
Socket
BGA1364
BGA 1528
Cores/Threads
4 /4
4/8
TDP
47 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
32+32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
256 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
6144 kB
Date
April 2014
August 2019
Mean monothread perf.
40.65k points
55.86k points
Mean multithread perf.
155.24k points
145.51k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-4710HQ
i5-10210U
Test#1 (Integers)
20.98k
23.11k (x1.1)
Test#2 (FP)
10.48k
20.58k (x1.96)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.75k
4.73k (x1)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.44k
7.43k (x1.67)
TOTAL
40.65k
55.86k (x1.37)
Multithread
i7-4710HQ
i5-10210U
Test#1 (Integers)
77.73k
65.84k (x0.85)
Test#2 (FP)
52.12k
60.77k (x1.17)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
20.55k
14.45k (x0.7)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.85k
4.44k (x0.92)
TOTAL
155.24k
145.51k (x0.94)
Performance/W
i7-4710HQ
i5-10210U
Test#1 (Integers)
1654 points/W
4389 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1109 points/W
4052 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
437 points/W
964 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
103 points/W
296 points/W
TOTAL
3303 points/W
9701 points/W
Performance/GHz
i7-4710HQ
i5-10210U
Test#1 (Integers)
5994 points/GHz
5503 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2993 points/GHz
4900 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1358 points/GHz
1127 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1269 points/GHz
1769 points/GHz
TOTAL
11614 points/GHz
13299 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4