Core i7-4600U vs Xeon Bronze 3206R
Description
The i7-4600U is based on Haswell architecture while the 3206R is based on Cascade Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-4600U gets a score of 64.5 k points while the 3206R gets 216 k points.
Summarizing, the 3206R is 3.3 times faster than the i7-4600U . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-4600U gets a score of 64.5 k points while the 3206R gets 216 k points.
Summarizing, the 3206R is 3.3 times faster than the i7-4600U . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
40651
50657
Core
Haswell
Cascade Lake-SP
Base frecuency
2.1 GHz
1.9 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.3 GHz
1.9 GHz
Socket
BGA1168
LGA 3647-0
Cores/Threads
2/4
8/8
TDP
15 W
85 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
32+32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
256 kB
8x1024 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
11264 kB
Date
September 2013
February 2020
Mean monothread perf.
28.98k points
31.52k points
Mean multithread perf.
64.55k points
216.02k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-4600U
3206R
Test#1 (Integers)
14.37k
12.92k (x0.9)
Test#2 (FP)
8.31k
10.97k (x1.32)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.35k
2.54k (x0.76)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.96k
5.09k (x1.72)
TOTAL
28.98k
31.52k (x1.09)
Multithread
i7-4600U
3206R
Test#1 (Integers)
31.32k
103.33k (x3.3)
Test#2 (FP)
20.17k
87.67k (x4.35)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.02k
20.1k (x2.51)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.03k
4.91k (x0.97)
TOTAL
64.55k
216.02k (x3.35)
Performance/W
i7-4600U
3206R
Test#1 (Integers)
2088 points/W
1216 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1345 points/W
1031 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
535 points/W
237 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
336 points/W
58 points/W
TOTAL
4303 points/W
2541 points/W
Performance/GHz
i7-4600U
3206R
Test#1 (Integers)
4353 points/GHz
6801 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2517 points/GHz
5774 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1015 points/GHz
1334 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
896 points/GHz
2678 points/GHz
TOTAL
8781 points/GHz
16588 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4