| | | | | | |

Core i7-3770 vs i7-6700HQ


Description
The i7-3770 is based on Ivy Bridge architecture while the i7-6700HQ is based on Skylake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-3770 gets a score of 133.7 k points while the i7-6700HQ gets 145.7 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-6700HQ is 1.1 times faster than the i7-3770 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
306a9
506e3
Core
Ivy Bridge
Skylake-H
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.4 GHz
2.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.9 GHz
3.5 GHz
Socket
LGA 1155
BGA1440
Cores/Threads
4/8
4/8
TDP
77 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x62+4x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
6144 kB
Date
April 2012
Mean monothread perf.
34.59k points
50.54k points
Mean multithread perf.
133.7k points
205.24k points

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i7-3770
i7-6700HQ
Test#1 (Integers)
12.55k
11.23k (x0.89)
Test#2 (FP)
12.11k
16.98k (x1.4)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.69k
4.21k (x0.9)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.25k
7.07k (x1.35)
TOTAL
34.59k
39.49k (x1.14)

Multithread

i7-3770

i7-6700HQ
Test#1 (Integers)
49.56k
44.59k (x0.9)
Test#2 (FP)
56.21k
75.02k (x1.33)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
22.17k
20.15k (x0.91)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.75k
5.92k (x1.03)
TOTAL
133.7k
145.68k (x1.09)

Performance/W
i7-3770
i7-6700HQ
Test#1 (Integers)
644 points/W
991 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
730 points/W
1667 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
288 points/W
448 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
75 points/W
131 points/W
TOTAL
1736 points/W
3237 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-3770
i7-6700HQ
Test#1 (Integers)
3217 points/GHz
3208 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3104 points/GHz
4853 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1202 points/GHz
1203 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1347 points/GHz
2021 points/GHz
TOTAL
8870 points/GHz
11284 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4