Core i7-10750H vs FX 8350
Description
The i7-10750H is based on Comet Lake architecture while the 8350 is based on Piledriver.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-10750H gets a score of 212.5 k points while the 8350 gets 118.1 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-10750H is 1.8 times faster than the 8350. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-10750H gets a score of 212.5 k points while the 8350 gets 118.1 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-10750H is 1.8 times faster than the 8350. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a0652
600f20
Core
Comet Lake-H
Vishera
Base frecuency
2.6 GHz
4 GHz
Boost frecuency
5 GHz
4.1 GHz
Socket
BGA 1440
Socket AM3+
Cores/Threads
6/12
8/8
TDP
45 W
125 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
4x2048 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
8192 kB
Date
April 2020
October 2012
Mean monothread perf.
75.67k points
28.16k points
Mean multithread perf.
349.21k points
118.14k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i7-10750H
8350
Test#1 (Integers)
16.71k
9.85k (x0.59)
Test#2 (FP)
25.45k
8.41k (x0.33)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.06k
3.58k (x0.59)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.2k
6.32k (x0.48)
TOTAL
61.43k
28.16k (x0.46)
Multithread
i7-10750H
8350
Test#1 (Integers)
67.59k
44.93k (x0.66)
Test#2 (FP)
111.94k
45.21k (x0.4)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
27.7k
22.81k (x0.82)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.3k
5.19k (x0.98)
TOTAL
212.53k
118.14k (x0.56)
Performance/W
i7-10750H
8350
Test#1 (Integers)
1502 points/W
359 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2487 points/W
362 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
615 points/W
182 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
118 points/W
42 points/W
TOTAL
4723 points/W
945 points/W
Performance/GHz
i7-10750H
8350
Test#1 (Integers)
3342 points/GHz
2402 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5091 points/GHz
2050 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1213 points/GHz
874 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2639 points/GHz
1541 points/GHz
TOTAL
12285 points/GHz
6867 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4