Core i7-10510U vs Ryzen 9 5900X
Description
The i7-10510U is based on Comet Lake architecture while the 5900X is based on Zen 3.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-10510U gets a score of 190.8 k points while the 5900X gets 816 k points.
Summarizing, the 5900X is 4.3 times faster than the i7-10510U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-10510U gets a score of 190.8 k points while the 5900X gets 816 k points.
Summarizing, the 5900X is 4.3 times faster than the i7-10510U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
806ec
a20f12
Core
Comet Lake-U
Vermeer
Base frecuency
1.8 GHz
3.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.9 GHz
4.8 GHz
Socket
BGA 1528
AM4
Cores/Threads
4/8
12/24
TDP
15 W
105 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
12x32+12x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
12x512 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
2x32768 kB
Date
August 2019
November 2020
Mean monothread perf.
59.01k points
83.42k points
Mean multithread perf.
190.82k points
816.01k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-10510U
5900X
Test#1 (Integers)
22.85k
22.58k (x0.99)
Test#2 (FP)
21.15k
24.83k (x1.17)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.78k
11.23k (x2.35)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.24k
24.78k (x2.42)
TOTAL
59.01k
83.42k (x1.41)
Multithread
i7-10510U
5900X
Test#1 (Integers)
86.08k
259.31k (x3.01)
Test#2 (FP)
79.78k
343.12k (x4.3)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
18.26k
155.92k (x8.54)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.69k
57.66k (x8.61)
TOTAL
190.82k
816.01k (x4.28)
Performance/W
i7-10510U
5900X
Test#1 (Integers)
5739 points/W
2470 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
5319 points/W
3268 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1217 points/W
1485 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
446 points/W
549 points/W
TOTAL
12721 points/W
7772 points/W
Performance/GHz
i7-10510U
5900X
Test#1 (Integers)
4664 points/GHz
4704 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4316 points/GHz
5172 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
975 points/GHz
2340 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2089 points/GHz
5163 points/GHz
TOTAL
12044 points/GHz
17379 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4