| | | | | | |

Core i5-9500T vs Pentium G4560


Description
The i5-9500T is based on Coffee Lake architecture while the G4560 is based on Kaby Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-9500T gets a score of 207.1 k points while the G4560 gets 89.9 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-9500T is 2.3 times faster than the G4560. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
906ea
906e9
Core
Coffee Lake-S
Kaby Lake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.2 GHz
3.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.7 GHz
3.5 GHz
Socket
LGA 1151
LGA1151
Cores/Threads
6/6
2/4
TDP
35 W
54 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
2x32 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
9216 kB
3072 kB
Date
July 2019
January 2017
Mean monothread perf.
61.46k points
44.21k points
Mean multithread perf.
274.02k points
89.91k points

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i5-9500T
G4560
Test#1 (Integers)
12.4k
13.01k (x1.05)
Test#2 (FP)
18.41k
18.74k (x1.02)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.69k
5.06k (x1.08)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.48k
7.4k (x0.71)
TOTAL
45.98k
44.21k (x0.96)

Multithread

i5-9500T

G4560
Test#1 (Integers)
74.86k
27.22k (x0.36)
Test#2 (FP)
105.88k
43.79k (x0.41)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
22.34k
11.74k (x0.53)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.01k
7.16k (x1.79)
TOTAL
207.08k
89.91k (x0.43)

Performance/W
i5-9500T
G4560
Test#1 (Integers)
2139 points/W
504 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3025 points/W
811 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
638 points/W
217 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
114 points/W
133 points/W
TOTAL
5917 points/W
1665 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-9500T
G4560
Test#1 (Integers)
3352 points/GHz
3718 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4974 points/GHz
5355 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1267 points/GHz
1445 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2834 points/GHz
2114 points/GHz
TOTAL
12427 points/GHz
12632 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4