| | | | | | |

Core i5-9500 vs i5-1235U


Description
The i5-9500 is based on Coffee Lake architecture while the i5-1235U is based on Alder Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-9500 gets a score of 352.8 k points while the i5-1235U gets 297.5 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-9500 is 1.2 times faster than the i5-1235U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
906ea
906a4
Core
Coffee Lake-S
Alder Lake-U
Architecture
Base frecuency
3 GHz
3.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.4 GHz
4.4 GHz
Socket
LGA 1151
BGA 1700
Cores/Threads
6/6
10/12
TDP
65 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
2x32/8x64+2x48/8x32 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
1x1280+4x2048 kB
Cache L3
9216 kB
12288 kB
Date
April 2019
April 2022
Mean monothread perf.
73.65k points
81.64k points
Mean multithread perf.
352.84k points
297.46k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i5-9500
i5-1235U
Test#1 (Integers)
4.45k
7.33k (x1.65)
Test#2 (FP)
18.43k
18.27k (x0.99)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.84k
12.8k (x2.19)
Test#1 (Memory)
12.63k
13.2k (x1.05)
TOTAL
41.34k
51.61k (x1.25)

Multithread

i5-9500

i5-1235U
Test#1 (Integers)
24.75k
29.24k (x1.18)
Test#2 (FP)
103.1k
83.32k (x0.81)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
32.43k
54.53k (x1.68)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.56k
4.99k (x0.9)
TOTAL
165.85k
172.07k (x1.04)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i5-9500
i5-1235U
Test#1 (Integers)
16.06k
23.53k (x1.47)
Test#2 (FP)
23.19k
23.51k (x1.01)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.1k
14.71k (x2.41)
Test#1 (Memory)
12.79k
13.24k (x1.04)
TOTAL
58.14k
74.99k (x1.29)

Multithread

i5-9500

i5-1235U
Test#1 (Integers)
90.44k
106.07k (x1.17)
Test#2 (FP)
131.23k
115.88k (x0.88)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
33.85k
60.53k (x1.79)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.59k
5.88k (x1.05)
TOTAL
261.11k
288.36k (x1.1)

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-9500
i5-1235U
Test#1 (Integers)
16.14k
23.03k (x1.43)
Test#2 (FP)
24.18k
24.11k (x1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.87k
13.9k (x2.37)
Test#1 (Memory)
12.5k
12.11k (x0.97)
TOTAL
58.69k
73.15k (x1.25)

Multithread

i5-9500

i5-1235U
Test#1 (Integers)
92.21k
111.78k (x1.21)
Test#2 (FP)
137.92k
124.18k (x0.9)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
33.12k
59.87k (x1.81)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.56k
5.76k (x1.04)
TOTAL
268.8k
301.58k (x1.12)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-9500
i5-1235U
Test#1 (Integers)
29.17k
36.73k (x1.26)
Test#2 (FP)
25.49k
22.09k (x0.87)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.84k
11.24k (x1.92)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.15k
11.58k (x0.88)
TOTAL
73.65k
81.64k (x1.11)

Multithread

i5-9500

i5-1235U
Test#1 (Integers)
166.66k
130.18k (x0.78)
Test#2 (FP)
146.9k
110.21k (x0.75)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
34.04k
50.76k (x1.49)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.25k
6.31k (x1.2)
TOTAL
352.84k
297.46k (x0.84)

Performance/W
i5-9500
i5-1235U
Test#1 (Integers)
2564 points/W
8679 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2260 points/W
7348 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
524 points/W
3384 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
81 points/W
421 points/W
TOTAL
5428 points/W
19831 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-9500
i5-1235U
Test#1 (Integers)
6629 points/GHz
8349 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5793 points/GHz
5020 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1327 points/GHz
2555 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2990 points/GHz
2631 points/GHz
TOTAL
16739 points/GHz
18555 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4