| | | | | | |

Core i5-9400F vs i5-4570


Description
The i5-9400F is based on Coffee Lake architecture while the i5-4570 is based on Haswell.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-9400F gets a score of 331.2 k points while the i5-4570 gets 161.6 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-9400F is 2 times faster than the i5-4570 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
906ea
306c3
Core
Coffee Lake-S
Haswell
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.9 GHz
3.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.1 GHz
3.6 GHz
Socket
LGA 1151
LGA 1150
Cores/Threads
6/6
4/4
TDP
65 W
84 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
32+32 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
9216 kB
6144 kB
Date
January 2019
September 2013
Mean monothread perf.
67.77k points
43.56k points
Mean multithread perf.
331.19k points
161.61k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-9400F
i5-4570
Test#1 (Integers)
27.15k
21.72k (x0.8)
Test#2 (FP)
23.63k
12.27k (x0.52)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.38k
5.03k (x0.94)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.61k
4.54k (x0.39)
TOTAL
67.77k
43.56k (x0.64)

Multithread

i5-9400F

i5-4570
Test#1 (Integers)
156.61k
85.75k (x0.55)
Test#2 (FP)
138k
48.71k (x0.35)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
29.45k
20.08k (x0.68)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.14k
7.07k (x0.99)
TOTAL
331.19k
161.61k (x0.49)

Performance/W
i5-9400F
i5-4570
Test#1 (Integers)
2409 points/W
1021 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2123 points/W
580 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
453 points/W
239 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
110 points/W
84 points/W
TOTAL
5095 points/W
1924 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-9400F
i5-4570
Test#1 (Integers)
6622 points/GHz
6034 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5763 points/GHz
3408 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1312 points/GHz
1398 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2831 points/GHz
1261 points/GHz
TOTAL
16528 points/GHz
12101 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4