Core i5-8400H vs i7-1065G7
Description
The i5-8400H is based on Coffee Lake architecture while the i7-1065G7 is based on Ice Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-8400H gets a score of 195.9 k points while the i7-1065G7 gets 214.3 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-1065G7 is 1.1 times faster than the i5-8400H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-8400H gets a score of 195.9 k points while the i7-1065G7 gets 214.3 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-1065G7 is 1.1 times faster than the i5-8400H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
906ea
706e5
Core
Coffee Lake-H
Ice Lake-U
Base frecuency
2.5 GHz
1.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.2 GHz
3.9 GHz
Socket
BGA 1440
BGA 1526
Cores/Threads
4/8
4/8
TDP
45 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
4x32+4x48 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
8192 kB
Date
April 2018
August 2019
Mean monothread perf.
67.06k points
74.82k points
Mean multithread perf.
195.94k points
214.34k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-8400H
i7-1065G7
Test#1 (Integers)
26.51k
28.19k (x1.06)
Test#2 (FP)
23.61k
22.13k (x0.94)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.17k
10.32k (x2)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.76k
14.17k (x1.21)
TOTAL
67.06k
74.82k (x1.12)
Multithread
i5-8400H
i7-1065G7
Test#1 (Integers)
85.52k
86.39k (x1.01)
Test#2 (FP)
84.4k
86.22k (x1.02)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
19.19k
32.99k (x1.72)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.83k
8.75k (x1.28)
TOTAL
195.94k
214.34k (x1.09)
Performance/W
i5-8400H
i7-1065G7
Test#1 (Integers)
1901 points/W
5759 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1875 points/W
5748 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
426 points/W
2199 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
152 points/W
583 points/W
TOTAL
4354 points/W
14289 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-8400H
i7-1065G7
Test#1 (Integers)
6313 points/GHz
7229 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5622 points/GHz
5675 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1232 points/GHz
2646 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2800 points/GHz
3634 points/GHz
TOTAL
15967 points/GHz
19184 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4