Core i5-8400H vs Ryzen 3 2200G
Description
The i5-8400H is based on Coffee Lake architecture while the 2200G is based on Zen.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-8400H gets a score of 195.9 k points while the 2200G gets 157.5 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-8400H is 1.2 times faster than the 2200G. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-8400H gets a score of 195.9 k points while the 2200G gets 157.5 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-8400H is 1.2 times faster than the 2200G. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
906ea
810f10
Core
Coffee Lake-H
Raven Ridge
Base frecuency
2.5 GHz
3.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.2 GHz
3.7 GHz
Socket
BGA 1440
AM4
Cores/Threads
4/8
4/4
TDP
45 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
4x64+4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
4096 kB
Date
April 2018
February 2018
Mean monothread perf.
67.06k points
44.87k points
Mean multithread perf.
195.94k points
157.54k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-8400H
2200G
Test#1 (Integers)
26.51k
13.75k (x0.52)
Test#2 (FP)
23.61k
22.58k (x0.96)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.17k
4.99k (x0.97)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.76k
3.55k (x0.3)
TOTAL
67.06k
44.87k (x0.67)
Multithread
i5-8400H
2200G
Test#1 (Integers)
85.52k
50.99k (x0.6)
Test#2 (FP)
84.4k
84.4k (x1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
19.19k
18.95k (x0.99)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.83k
3.2k (x0.47)
TOTAL
195.94k
157.54k (x0.8)
Performance/W
i5-8400H
2200G
Test#1 (Integers)
1901 points/W
785 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1875 points/W
1298 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
426 points/W
292 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
152 points/W
49 points/W
TOTAL
4354 points/W
2424 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-8400H
2200G
Test#1 (Integers)
6313 points/GHz
3716 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5622 points/GHz
6102 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1232 points/GHz
1350 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2800 points/GHz
959 points/GHz
TOTAL
15967 points/GHz
12126 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4