Core i5-8400H vs i3-1115G4
Description
The i5-8400H is based on Coffee Lake architecture while the i3-1115G4 is based on Tiger Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-8400H gets a score of 195.9 k points while the i3-1115G4 gets 138 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-8400H is 1.4 times faster than the i3-1115G4. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-8400H gets a score of 195.9 k points while the i3-1115G4 gets 138 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-8400H is 1.4 times faster than the i3-1115G4. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
906ea
806c1
Core
Coffee Lake-H
Tiger Lake UP3
Base frecuency
2.5 GHz
3 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.2 GHz
4.1 GHz
Socket
BGA 1440
BGA1449
Cores/Threads
4/8
2/4
TDP
45 W
28 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
2x32+2x48 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
2x1280 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
6144 kB
Date
April 2018
September 2020
Mean monothread perf.
67.06k points
62.19k points
Mean multithread perf.
195.94k points
137.96k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-8400H
i3-1115G4
Test#1 (Integers)
26.51k
24.25k (x0.91)
Test#2 (FP)
23.61k
21.63k (x0.92)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.17k
9.09k (x1.76)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.76k
7.23k (x0.62)
TOTAL
67.06k
62.19k (x0.93)
Multithread
i5-8400H
i3-1115G4
Test#1 (Integers)
85.52k
56.9k (x0.67)
Test#2 (FP)
84.4k
55.68k (x0.66)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
19.19k
19.29k (x1.01)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.83k
6.09k (x0.89)
TOTAL
195.94k
137.96k (x0.7)
Performance/W
i5-8400H
i3-1115G4
Test#1 (Integers)
1901 points/W
2032 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1875 points/W
1989 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
426 points/W
689 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
152 points/W
217 points/W
TOTAL
4354 points/W
4927 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-8400H
i3-1115G4
Test#1 (Integers)
6313 points/GHz
5914 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5622 points/GHz
5275 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1232 points/GHz
2216 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2800 points/GHz
1764 points/GHz
TOTAL
15967 points/GHz
15169 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4