Core i5-8250U vs Ryzen 5 5600G
Description
The i5-8250U is based on Kaby Lake architecture while the 5600G is based on Zen 3.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-8250U gets a score of 153.5 k points while the 5600G gets 345.6 k points.
Summarizing, the 5600G is 2.3 times faster than the i5-8250U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-8250U gets a score of 153.5 k points while the 5600G gets 345.6 k points.
Summarizing, the 5600G is 2.3 times faster than the i5-8250U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
806ea
a50f00
Core
Kaby Lake-R
Cezanne
Base frecuency
1.6 GHz
3.9 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.4 GHz
4.4 GHz
Socket
BGA1356
AM4
Cores/Threads
4/8
6/12
TDP
15 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
16384 kB
Date
August 2017
April 2021
Mean monothread perf.
53.8k points
79.76k points
Mean multithread perf.
153.5k points
345.64k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-8250U
5600G
Test#1 (Integers)
22k
22.16k (x1.01)
Test#2 (FP)
19.55k
24.46k (x1.25)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.41k
10.71k (x2.43)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.83k
22.44k (x2.86)
TOTAL
53.8k
79.76k (x1.48)
Multithread
i5-8250U
5600G
Test#1 (Integers)
70.15k
112.5k (x1.6)
Test#2 (FP)
63.27k
153.92k (x2.43)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
15.29k
67.75k (x4.43)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.8k
11.47k (x2.39)
TOTAL
153.5k
345.64k (x2.25)
Performance/W
i5-8250U
5600G
Test#1 (Integers)
4676 points/W
1731 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4218 points/W
2368 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1019 points/W
1042 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
320 points/W
177 points/W
TOTAL
10233 points/W
5318 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-8250U
5600G
Test#1 (Integers)
6471 points/GHz
5036 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5750 points/GHz
5558 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1298 points/GHz
2434 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2304 points/GHz
5099 points/GHz
TOTAL
15823 points/GHz
18128 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4