Core i5-8250U vs Ryzen 3 1200
Description
The i5-8250U is based on Kaby Lake architecture while the 1200 is based on Zen.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-8250U gets a score of 153.5 k points while the 1200 gets 117.8 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-8250U is 1.3 times faster than the 1200. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-8250U gets a score of 153.5 k points while the 1200 gets 117.8 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-8250U is 1.3 times faster than the 1200. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
806ea
800f11
Core
Kaby Lake-R
Summit Ridge
Base frecuency
1.6 GHz
3.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.4 GHz
3.4 GHz
Socket
BGA1356
AM4
Cores/Threads
4/8
4/4
TDP
15 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
4x64+4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
8192 kB
Date
August 2017
July 2017
Mean monothread perf.
53.8k points
37.55k points
Mean multithread perf.
153.5k points
117.81k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-8250U
1200
Test#1 (Integers)
22k
11.73k (x0.53)
Test#2 (FP)
19.55k
18.85k (x0.96)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.41k
4.22k (x0.96)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.83k
2.76k (x0.35)
TOTAL
53.8k
37.55k (x0.7)
Multithread
i5-8250U
1200
Test#1 (Integers)
70.15k
38.56k (x0.55)
Test#2 (FP)
63.27k
62.21k (x0.98)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
15.29k
13.7k (x0.9)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.8k
3.33k (x0.69)
TOTAL
153.5k
117.81k (x0.77)
Performance/W
i5-8250U
1200
Test#1 (Integers)
4676 points/W
593 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4218 points/W
957 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1019 points/W
211 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
320 points/W
51 points/W
TOTAL
10233 points/W
1812 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-8250U
1200
Test#1 (Integers)
6471 points/GHz
3449 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5750 points/GHz
5544 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1298 points/GHz
1242 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2304 points/GHz
810 points/GHz
TOTAL
15823 points/GHz
11045 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4