Core i5-7400T vs Ryzen 9 5950X
Description
The i5-7400T is based on Kaby Lake architecture while the 5950X is based on Zen 3.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-7400T gets a score of 163.4 k points while the 5950X gets 1060.6 k points.
Summarizing, the 5950X is 6.5 times faster than the i5-7400T. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-7400T gets a score of 163.4 k points while the 5950X gets 1060.6 k points.
Summarizing, the 5950X is 6.5 times faster than the i5-7400T. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
906e9
a20f12
Core
Kaby Lake-S
Vermeer
Base frecuency
2.4 GHz
3.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
3 GHz
4.9 GHz
Socket
LGA 1151
AM4
Cores/Threads
4/4
16/32
TDP
35 W
105 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
16x32+16x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
16x512 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
2x32768 kB
Date
January 2017
November 2020
Mean monothread perf.
49.16k points
79.51k points
Mean multithread perf.
163.4k points
1060.62k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-7400T
5950X
Test#1 (Integers)
19.7k
19.88k (x1.01)
Test#2 (FP)
17.29k
25.26k (x1.46)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.07k
10.77k (x2.65)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.1k
23.59k (x2.91)
TOTAL
49.16k
79.51k (x1.62)
Multithread
i5-7400T
5950X
Test#1 (Integers)
75.27k
349.53k (x4.64)
Test#2 (FP)
66.24k
470.67k (x7.11)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
13.93k
207.28k (x14.88)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.95k
33.13k (x4.17)
TOTAL
163.4k
1060.62k (x6.49)
Performance/W
i5-7400T
5950X
Test#1 (Integers)
2151 points/W
3329 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1893 points/W
4483 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
398 points/W
1974 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
227 points/W
316 points/W
TOTAL
4669 points/W
10101 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-7400T
5950X
Test#1 (Integers)
6568 points/GHz
4058 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5764 points/GHz
5155 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1356 points/GHz
2198 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2700 points/GHz
4815 points/GHz
TOTAL
16388 points/GHz
16226 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4