| | | | | | |

Core i5-7300U vs Xeon E3-1225


Description
The i5-7300U is based on Kaby Lake architecture while the E3-1225 is based on Sandy Bridge.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-7300U gets a score of 82.9 k points while the E3-1225 gets 69 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-7300U is 1.2 times faster than the E3-1225. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
806e9
206a7
Core
Kaby Lake-U
Sandy Bridge
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.6 GHz
3.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.5 GHz
3.4 GHz
Socket
BGA1356
LGA 1155
Cores/Threads
2/4
4/4
TDP
15 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
6144 kB
Date
January 2017
April 2011
Mean monothread perf.
48.25k points
23.94k points
Mean multithread perf.
109.1k points
68.97k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i5-7300U
E3-1225
Test#1 (Integers)
3.11k
2.63k (x0.85)
Test#2 (FP)
12.24k
7.2k (x0.59)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.1k
3.71k (x0.9)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.96k
2.55k (x0.51)
TOTAL
24.41k
16.08k (x0.66)

Multithread

i5-7300U

E3-1225
Test#1 (Integers)
6.98k
8.23k (x1.18)
Test#2 (FP)
32.05k
22.82k (x0.71)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.82k
11.68k (x1.08)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.52k
2.12k (x0.38)
TOTAL
55.36k
44.85k (x0.81)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i5-7300U
E3-1225
Test#1 (Integers)
9.96k
9.65k (x0.97)
Test#2 (FP)
15.11k
7.76k (x0.51)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.87k
3.95k (x1.02)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.54k
2.57k (x0.57)
TOTAL
33.47k
23.94k (x0.72)

Multithread

i5-7300U

E3-1225
Test#1 (Integers)
25.26k
30.52k (x1.21)
Test#2 (FP)
40.6k
24.1k (x0.59)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
11.24k
12.01k (x1.07)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.83k
2.34k (x0.4)
TOTAL
82.94k
68.97k (x0.83)

Performance/W
i5-7300U
E3-1225
Test#1 (Integers)
1684 points/W
321 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2707 points/W
254 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
750 points/W
126 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
389 points/W
25 points/W
TOTAL
5530 points/W
726 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-7300U
E3-1225
Test#1 (Integers)
2845 points/GHz
2839 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4316 points/GHz
2283 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1105 points/GHz
1162 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1296 points/GHz
757 points/GHz
TOTAL
9563 points/GHz
7041 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4