| | | | | | |

Core i5-7300U vs i7-10750H


Description
The i5-7300U is based on Kaby Lake architecture while the i7-10750H is based on Comet Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-7300U gets a score of 109.1 k points while the i7-10750H gets 349.2 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-10750H is 3.2 times faster than the i5-7300U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
806e9
a0652
Core
Kaby Lake-U
Comet Lake-H
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.6 GHz
2.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.5 GHz
5 GHz
Socket
BGA1356
BGA 1440
Cores/Threads
2/4
6/12
TDP
15 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
12288 kB
Date
January 2017
April 2020
Mean monothread perf.
48.25k points
75.67k points
Mean multithread perf.
109.1k points
349.21k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i5-7300U
i7-10750H
Test#1 (Integers)
3.11k
4.69k (x1.51)
Test#2 (FP)
12.24k
18.71k (x1.53)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.1k
5.84k (x1.42)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.96k
13.95k (x2.81)
TOTAL
24.41k
43.19k (x1.77)

Multithread

i5-7300U

i7-10750H
Test#1 (Integers)
6.98k
18.79k (x2.69)
Test#2 (FP)
32.05k
86.1k (x2.69)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.82k
27.42k (x2.53)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.52k
5.27k (x0.96)
TOTAL
55.36k
137.58k (x2.49)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i5-7300U
i7-10750H
Test#1 (Integers)
9.96k
16.63k (x1.67)
Test#2 (FP)
15.11k
24.17k (x1.6)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.87k
6.38k (x1.65)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.54k
13.69k (x3.02)
TOTAL
33.47k
60.87k (x1.82)

Multithread

i5-7300U

i7-10750H
Test#1 (Integers)
25.26k
67.07k (x2.65)
Test#2 (FP)
40.6k
107.95k (x2.66)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
11.24k
27.05k (x2.41)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.83k
5.07k (x0.87)
TOTAL
82.94k
207.14k (x2.5)

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-7300U
i7-10750H
Test#1 (Integers)
9.85k
16.71k (x1.7)
Test#2 (FP)
17.37k
25.45k (x1.47)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.98k
6.06k (x1.52)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.11k
13.2k (x2.58)
TOTAL
36.31k
61.43k (x1.69)

Multithread

i5-7300U

i7-10750H
Test#1 (Integers)
25.37k
67.59k (x2.66)
Test#2 (FP)
43.43k
111.94k (x2.58)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.62k
27.7k (x2.61)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.4k
5.3k (x0.98)
TOTAL
84.82k
212.53k (x2.51)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-7300U
i7-10750H
Test#1 (Integers)
20.18k
29.06k (x1.44)
Test#2 (FP)
18.57k
26.49k (x1.43)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.24k
6.23k (x1.47)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.25k
13.89k (x2.64)
TOTAL
48.25k
75.67k (x1.57)

Multithread

i5-7300U

i7-10750H
Test#1 (Integers)
47.75k
154.61k (x3.24)
Test#2 (FP)
44.82k
151.34k (x3.38)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.82k
36.33k (x3.36)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.7k
6.93k (x1.22)
TOTAL
109.1k
349.21k (x3.2)

Performance/W
i5-7300U
i7-10750H
Test#1 (Integers)
3184 points/W
3436 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2988 points/W
3363 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
721 points/W
807 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
380 points/W
154 points/W
TOTAL
7273 points/W
7760 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-7300U
i7-10750H
Test#1 (Integers)
5766 points/GHz
5811 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5306 points/GHz
5298 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1213 points/GHz
1246 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1501 points/GHz
2778 points/GHz
TOTAL
13785 points/GHz
15133 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4