Core i5-7300U vs Ryzen 9 5950X
Description
The i5-7300U is based on Kaby Lake architecture while the 5950X is based on Zen 3.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-7300U gets a score of 109.1 k points while the 5950X gets 1060.6 k points.
Summarizing, the 5950X is 9.7 times faster than the i5-7300U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-7300U gets a score of 109.1 k points while the 5950X gets 1060.6 k points.
Summarizing, the 5950X is 9.7 times faster than the i5-7300U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
806e9
a20f12
Core
Kaby Lake-U
Vermeer
Base frecuency
2.6 GHz
3.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.5 GHz
4.9 GHz
Socket
BGA1356
AM4
Cores/Threads
2/4
16/32
TDP
15 W
105 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
16x32+16x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
16x512 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
2x32768 kB
Date
January 2017
November 2020
Mean monothread perf.
48.25k points
79.51k points
Mean multithread perf.
109.1k points
1060.62k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-7300U
5950X
Test#1 (Integers)
20.18k
19.88k (x0.99)
Test#2 (FP)
18.57k
25.26k (x1.36)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.24k
10.77k (x2.54)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.25k
23.59k (x4.49)
TOTAL
48.25k
79.51k (x1.65)
Multithread
i5-7300U
5950X
Test#1 (Integers)
47.75k
349.53k (x7.32)
Test#2 (FP)
44.82k
470.67k (x10.5)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.82k
207.28k (x19.15)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.7k
33.13k (x5.81)
TOTAL
109.1k
1060.62k (x9.72)
Performance/W
i5-7300U
5950X
Test#1 (Integers)
3184 points/W
3329 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2988 points/W
4483 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
721 points/W
1974 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
380 points/W
316 points/W
TOTAL
7273 points/W
10101 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-7300U
5950X
Test#1 (Integers)
5766 points/GHz
4058 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5306 points/GHz
5155 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1213 points/GHz
2198 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1501 points/GHz
4815 points/GHz
TOTAL
13785 points/GHz
16226 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4