| | | | | | |

Core i5-7300U vs FX 6100


Description
The i5-7300U is based on Kaby Lake architecture while the 6100 is based on Bulldozer.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-7300U gets a score of 84.8 k points while the 6100 gets 65.3 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-7300U is 1.3 times faster than the 6100. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
806e9
600f12
Core
Kaby Lake-U
Zambezi
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.6 GHz
3.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.5 GHz
3.9 GHz
Socket
BGA1356
Socket AM3+
Cores/Threads
2/4
6/6
TDP
15 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
3x64+6x16 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
3x2048 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
8192 kB
Date
January 2017
October 2011
Mean monothread perf.
48.25k points
20.42k points
Mean multithread perf.
109.1k points
65.32k points

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-7300U
6100
Test#1 (Integers)
9.85k
7.15k (x0.73)
Test#2 (FP)
17.37k
6.53k (x0.38)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.98k
2.55k (x0.64)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.11k
4.2k (x0.82)
TOTAL
36.31k
20.42k (x0.56)

Multithread

i5-7300U

6100
Test#1 (Integers)
25.37k
24.5k (x0.97)
Test#2 (FP)
43.43k
23.85k (x0.55)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.62k
13.45k (x1.27)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.4k
3.51k (x0.65)
TOTAL
84.82k
65.32k (x0.77)

Performance/W
i5-7300U
6100
Test#1 (Integers)
1691 points/W
258 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2896 points/W
251 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
708 points/W
142 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
360 points/W
37 points/W
TOTAL
5655 points/W
688 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-7300U
6100
Test#1 (Integers)
2816 points/GHz
1832 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4962 points/GHz
1673 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1137 points/GHz
653 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1461 points/GHz
1077 points/GHz
TOTAL
10376 points/GHz
5235 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4