Core i5-7300U vs Athlon X4 760K
Description
The i5-7300U is based on Kaby Lake architecture while the 760K is based on Piledriver.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-7300U gets a score of 84.8 k points while the 760K gets 49.8 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-7300U is 1.7 times faster than the 760K. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-7300U gets a score of 84.8 k points while the 760K gets 49.8 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-7300U is 1.7 times faster than the 760K. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
806e9
610f31
Core
Kaby Lake-U
Richland
Base frecuency
2.6 GHz
3.8 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.5 GHz
4.1 GHz
Socket
BGA1356
Socket FM2
Cores/Threads
2/4
4/4
TDP
15 W
100 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
4x16+2x64 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
2x2048 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
kB
Date
January 2017
June 2013
Mean monothread perf.
48.25k points
24.6k points
Mean multithread perf.
109.1k points
49.8k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-7300U
760K
Test#1 (Integers)
9.85k
9.53k (x0.97)
Test#2 (FP)
17.37k
8.14k (x0.47)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.98k
3.45k (x0.87)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.11k
3.48k (x0.68)
TOTAL
36.31k
24.6k (x0.68)
Multithread
i5-7300U
760K
Test#1 (Integers)
25.37k
18.2k (x0.72)
Test#2 (FP)
43.43k
19.33k (x0.45)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.62k
8.42k (x0.79)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.4k
3.86k (x0.71)
TOTAL
84.82k
49.8k (x0.59)
Performance/W
i5-7300U
760K
Test#1 (Integers)
1691 points/W
182 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2896 points/W
193 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
708 points/W
84 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
360 points/W
39 points/W
TOTAL
5655 points/W
498 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-7300U
760K
Test#1 (Integers)
2816 points/GHz
2324 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4962 points/GHz
1986 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1137 points/GHz
842 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1461 points/GHz
849 points/GHz
TOTAL
10376 points/GHz
6001 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4