| | | | | | |

Core i5-7300U vs i5-12500H


Description
The i5-7300U is based on Kaby Lake architecture while the i5-12500H is based on Alder Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-7300U gets a score of 109.1 k points while the i5-12500H gets 225.7 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-12500H is 2.1 times faster than the i5-7300U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
806e9
906a3
Core
Kaby Lake-U
Alder Lake-H
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.6 GHz
2.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.5 GHz
4.5 GHz
Socket
BGA1356
BGA 1744
Cores/Threads
2/4
12/16
TDP
15 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
4x32/8X64+4x48/8X32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
4x1280/2x2048 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
18432 kB
Date
January 2017
February 2022
Mean monothread perf.
48.25k points
58.37k points
Mean multithread perf.
109.1k points
225.65k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i5-7300U
i5-12500H
Test#1 (Integers)
3.11k
6.93k (x2.23)
Test#2 (FP)
12.24k
18.76k (x1.53)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.1k
9.46k (x2.31)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.96k
8.17k (x1.65)
TOTAL
24.41k
43.33k (x1.78)

Multithread

i5-7300U

i5-12500H
Test#1 (Integers)
6.98k
18.04k (x2.59)
Test#2 (FP)
32.05k
66.78k (x2.08)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.82k
37.55k (x3.47)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.52k
6.08k (x1.1)
TOTAL
55.36k
128.45k (x2.32)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i5-7300U
i5-12500H
Test#1 (Integers)
9.96k
21.93k (x2.2)
Test#2 (FP)
15.11k
18.79k (x1.24)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.87k
10.5k (x2.72)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.54k
8.11k (x1.79)
TOTAL
33.47k
59.33k (x1.77)

Multithread

i5-7300U

i5-12500H
Test#1 (Integers)
25.26k
61.07k (x2.42)
Test#2 (FP)
40.6k
86.08k (x2.12)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
11.24k
41.08k (x3.65)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.83k
6.02k (x1.03)
TOTAL
82.94k
194.25k (x2.34)

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-7300U
i5-12500H
Test#1 (Integers)
9.85k
21.11k (x2.14)
Test#2 (FP)
17.37k
19.61k (x1.13)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.98k
9.53k (x2.4)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.11k
7.72k (x1.51)
TOTAL
36.31k
57.97k (x1.6)

Multithread

i5-7300U

i5-12500H
Test#1 (Integers)
25.37k
61.44k (x2.42)
Test#2 (FP)
43.43k
93.66k (x2.16)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.62k
40.09k (x3.78)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.4k
6.01k (x1.11)
TOTAL
84.82k
201.2k (x2.37)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-7300U
i5-12500H
Test#1 (Integers)
20.18k
22.61k (x1.12)
Test#2 (FP)
18.57k
17.73k (x0.95)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.24k
9.63k (x2.27)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.25k
8.4k (x1.6)
TOTAL
48.25k
58.37k (x1.21)

Multithread

i5-7300U

i5-12500H
Test#1 (Integers)
47.75k
85.49k (x1.79)
Test#2 (FP)
44.82k
94.93k (x2.12)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.82k
39.15k (x3.62)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.7k
6.08k (x1.07)
TOTAL
109.1k
225.65k (x2.07)

Performance/W
i5-7300U
i5-12500H
Test#1 (Integers)
3184 points/W
1900 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2988 points/W
2110 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
721 points/W
870 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
380 points/W
135 points/W
TOTAL
7273 points/W
5014 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-7300U
i5-12500H
Test#1 (Integers)
5766 points/GHz
5025 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5306 points/GHz
3939 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1213 points/GHz
2139 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1501 points/GHz
1867 points/GHz
TOTAL
13785 points/GHz
12971 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4