| | | | | | |

Core i5-7300U vs i5-1235U


Description
The i5-7300U is based on Kaby Lake architecture while the i5-1235U is based on Alder Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-7300U gets a score of 109.1 k points while the i5-1235U gets 297.5 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-1235U is 2.7 times faster than the i5-7300U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
806e9
906a4
Core
Kaby Lake-U
Alder Lake-U
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.6 GHz
3.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.5 GHz
4.4 GHz
Socket
BGA1356
BGA 1700
Cores/Threads
2/4
10/12
TDP
15 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
2x32/8x64+2x48/8x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
1x1280+4x2048 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
12288 kB
Date
January 2017
April 2022
Mean monothread perf.
48.25k points
81.64k points
Mean multithread perf.
109.1k points
297.46k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i5-7300U
i5-1235U
Test#1 (Integers)
3.11k
7.33k (x2.36)
Test#2 (FP)
12.24k
18.27k (x1.49)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.1k
12.8k (x3.12)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.96k
13.2k (x2.66)
TOTAL
24.41k
51.61k (x2.11)

Multithread

i5-7300U

i5-1235U
Test#1 (Integers)
6.98k
29.24k (x4.19)
Test#2 (FP)
32.05k
83.32k (x2.6)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.82k
54.53k (x5.04)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.52k
4.99k (x0.91)
TOTAL
55.36k
172.07k (x3.11)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i5-7300U
i5-1235U
Test#1 (Integers)
9.96k
23.53k (x2.36)
Test#2 (FP)
15.11k
23.51k (x1.56)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.87k
14.71k (x3.8)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.54k
13.24k (x2.92)
TOTAL
33.47k
74.99k (x2.24)

Multithread

i5-7300U

i5-1235U
Test#1 (Integers)
25.26k
106.07k (x4.2)
Test#2 (FP)
40.6k
115.88k (x2.85)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
11.24k
60.53k (x5.38)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.83k
5.88k (x1.01)
TOTAL
82.94k
288.36k (x3.48)

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-7300U
i5-1235U
Test#1 (Integers)
9.85k
23.03k (x2.34)
Test#2 (FP)
17.37k
24.11k (x1.39)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.98k
13.9k (x3.49)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.11k
12.11k (x2.37)
TOTAL
36.31k
73.15k (x2.01)

Multithread

i5-7300U

i5-1235U
Test#1 (Integers)
25.37k
111.78k (x4.41)
Test#2 (FP)
43.43k
124.18k (x2.86)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.62k
59.87k (x5.64)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.4k
5.76k (x1.07)
TOTAL
84.82k
301.58k (x3.56)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-7300U
i5-1235U
Test#1 (Integers)
20.18k
36.73k (x1.82)
Test#2 (FP)
18.57k
22.09k (x1.19)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.24k
11.24k (x2.65)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.25k
11.58k (x2.2)
TOTAL
48.25k
81.64k (x1.69)

Multithread

i5-7300U

i5-1235U
Test#1 (Integers)
47.75k
130.18k (x2.73)
Test#2 (FP)
44.82k
110.21k (x2.46)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.82k
50.76k (x4.69)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.7k
6.31k (x1.11)
TOTAL
109.1k
297.46k (x2.73)

Performance/W
i5-7300U
i5-1235U
Test#1 (Integers)
3184 points/W
8679 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2988 points/W
7348 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
721 points/W
3384 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
380 points/W
421 points/W
TOTAL
7273 points/W
19831 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-7300U
i5-1235U
Test#1 (Integers)
5766 points/GHz
8349 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5306 points/GHz
5020 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1213 points/GHz
2555 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1501 points/GHz
2631 points/GHz
TOTAL
13785 points/GHz
18555 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4