| | | | | | |

Core i5-7300HQ vs i5-10400F


Description
The i5-7300HQ is based on Kaby Lake architecture while the i5-10400F is based on Comet Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-7300HQ gets a score of 168.8 k points while the i5-10400F gets 369 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-10400F is 2.2 times faster than the i5-7300HQ. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
906e9
a0653
Core
Kaby Lake-H
Comet Lake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.5 GHz
2.9 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.5 GHz
4.3 GHz
Socket
BGA1440
LGA 1200
Cores/Threads
4/4
6/12
TDP
45 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
12288 kB
Date
January 2017
April 2020
Mean monothread perf.
53.51k points
68.02k points
Mean multithread perf.
168.81k points
369.01k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i5-7300HQ
i5-10400F
Test#1 (Integers)
3.41k
4.3k (x1.26)
Test#2 (FP)
14.14k
16.56k (x1.17)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.41k
5.25k (x1.19)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.87k
12.61k (x1.42)
TOTAL
30.83k
38.72k (x1.26)

Multithread

i5-7300HQ

i5-10400F
Test#1 (Integers)
12.75k
18.1k (x1.42)
Test#2 (FP)
52.88k
79.16k (x1.5)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
16.25k
26.75k (x1.65)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.98k
13.81k (x1.54)
TOTAL
90.85k
137.82k (x1.52)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-7300HQ
i5-10400F
Test#1 (Integers)
21.65k
26.29k (x1.21)
Test#2 (FP)
19.18k
23.38k (x1.22)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.38k
5.51k (x1.26)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.3k
12.84k (x1.55)
TOTAL
53.51k
68.02k (x1.27)

Multithread

i5-7300HQ

i5-10400F
Test#1 (Integers)
77.12k
163.37k (x2.12)
Test#2 (FP)
68.68k
159.38k (x2.32)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
15.24k
38.87k (x2.55)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.78k
7.39k (x0.95)
TOTAL
168.81k
369.01k (x2.19)

Performance/W
i5-7300HQ
i5-10400F
Test#1 (Integers)
1714 points/W
2513 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1526 points/W
2452 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
339 points/W
598 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
173 points/W
114 points/W
TOTAL
3751 points/W
5677 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-7300HQ
i5-10400F
Test#1 (Integers)
6186 points/GHz
6113 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5480 points/GHz
5437 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1251 points/GHz
1282 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2372 points/GHz
2987 points/GHz
TOTAL
15289 points/GHz
15819 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4