Core i5-7300HQ vs Ryzen 3 3300U
Description
The i5-7300HQ is based on Kaby Lake architecture while the 3300U is based on Zen+.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-7300HQ gets a score of 168.8 k points while the 3300U gets 139.6 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-7300HQ is 1.2 times faster than the 3300U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-7300HQ gets a score of 168.8 k points while the 3300U gets 139.6 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-7300HQ is 1.2 times faster than the 3300U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
906e9
810f81
Core
Kaby Lake-H
Picasso
Base frecuency
2.5 GHz
2.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.5 GHz
3.5 GHz
Socket
BGA1440
BGA-FP5
Cores/Threads
4/4
4/4
TDP
45 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
4x64+4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
4096 kB
Date
January 2017
January 2019
Mean monothread perf.
53.51k points
40.81k points
Mean multithread perf.
168.81k points
139.56k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-7300HQ
3300U
Test#1 (Integers)
21.65k
12k (x0.55)
Test#2 (FP)
19.18k
19.55k (x1.02)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.38k
4.43k (x1.01)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.3k
4.83k (x0.58)
TOTAL
53.51k
40.81k (x0.76)
Multithread
i5-7300HQ
3300U
Test#1 (Integers)
77.12k
43.64k (x0.57)
Test#2 (FP)
68.68k
73.99k (x1.08)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
15.24k
17.03k (x1.12)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.78k
4.91k (x0.63)
TOTAL
168.81k
139.56k (x0.83)
Performance/W
i5-7300HQ
3300U
Test#1 (Integers)
1714 points/W
2909 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1526 points/W
4933 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
339 points/W
1135 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
173 points/W
327 points/W
TOTAL
3751 points/W
9304 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-7300HQ
3300U
Test#1 (Integers)
6186 points/GHz
3430 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5480 points/GHz
5587 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1251 points/GHz
1266 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2372 points/GHz
1379 points/GHz
TOTAL
15289 points/GHz
11661 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4