Core i5-6400 vs i3-10110U
Description
The i5-6400 is based on Skylake architecture while the i3-10110U is based on Comet Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-6400 gets a score of 174.1 k points while the i3-10110U gets 106.6 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-6400 is 1.6 times faster than the i3-10110U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-6400 gets a score of 174.1 k points while the i3-10110U gets 106.6 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-6400 is 1.6 times faster than the i3-10110U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
506e3
806ec
Core
Skylake-S
Comet Lake-U
Base frecuency
2.7 GHz
2.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.3 GHz
4.1 GHz
Socket
LGA 1151
BGA 1528
Cores/Threads
4/4
2/4
TDP
65 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
4096 kB
Date
September 2015
January 2019
Mean monothread perf.
48.05k points
56.64k points
Mean multithread perf.
174.05k points
106.58k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i5-6400
i3-10110U
Test#1 (Integers)
3.2k
4.26k (x1.33)
Test#2 (FP)
12.81k
15.48k (x1.21)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.18k
4.94k (x1.18)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.3k
4.31k (x1)
TOTAL
24.49k
28.98k (x1.18)
Multithread
i5-6400
i3-10110U
Test#1 (Integers)
11.45k
7.41k (x0.65)
Test#2 (FP)
46.67k
29.18k (x0.63)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
14.69k
10.26k (x0.7)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.92k
3.27k (x0.55)
TOTAL
78.73k
50.13k (x0.64)
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i5-6400
i3-10110U
Test#1 (Integers)
11.56k
14.3k (x1.24)
Test#2 (FP)
16.53k
20.09k (x1.22)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.3k
5.23k (x1.22)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.97k
4.24k (x1.07)
TOTAL
36.36k
43.87k (x1.21)
Multithread
i5-6400
i3-10110U
Test#1 (Integers)
43.01k
25.51k (x0.59)
Test#2 (FP)
64.46k
41.33k (x0.64)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
16.14k
10.81k (x0.67)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.91k
3.21k (x0.54)
TOTAL
129.51k
80.85k (x0.62)
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-6400
i3-10110U
Test#1 (Integers)
11.82k
14.25k (x1.21)
Test#2 (FP)
18.36k
21.55k (x1.17)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.43k
5.16k (x1.17)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.95k
4.26k (x0.86)
TOTAL
39.56k
45.22k (x1.14)
Multithread
i5-6400
i3-10110U
Test#1 (Integers)
46.04k
26.15k (x0.57)
Test#2 (FP)
69.47k
44.03k (x0.63)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
16.33k
10.71k (x0.66)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.74k
3.28k (x0.42)
TOTAL
139.58k
84.17k (x0.6)
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-6400
i3-10110U
Test#1 (Integers)
21.1k
24.6k (x1.17)
Test#2 (FP)
18.28k
22.32k (x1.22)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.22k
5.02k (x1.19)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.45k
4.7k (x1.06)
TOTAL
48.05k
56.64k (x1.18)
Multithread
i5-6400
i3-10110U
Test#1 (Integers)
80.03k
47.98k (x0.6)
Test#2 (FP)
71.1k
44.28k (x0.62)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
16.19k
10.33k (x0.64)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.73k
3.98k (x0.59)
TOTAL
174.05k
106.58k (x0.61)
Performance/W
i5-6400
i3-10110U
Test#1 (Integers)
1231 points/W
3199 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1094 points/W
2952 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
249 points/W
689 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
104 points/W
265 points/W
TOTAL
2678 points/W
7105 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-6400
i3-10110U
Test#1 (Integers)
6394 points/GHz
6001 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5539 points/GHz
5444 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1279 points/GHz
1225 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1348 points/GHz
1146 points/GHz
TOTAL
14560 points/GHz
13815 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4