Core i5-5675R vs i9-13900K
Description
The i5-5675R is based on Broadwell architecture while the i9-13900K is based on Raptor Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-5675R gets a score of 194.2 k points while the i9-13900K gets 1763.1 k points.
Summarizing, the i9-13900K is 9.1 times faster than the i5-5675R. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-5675R gets a score of 194.2 k points while the i9-13900K gets 1763.1 k points.
Summarizing, the i9-13900K is 9.1 times faster than the i5-5675R. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
40671
b0671
Core
Bradwell-H
Raptor Lake-S
Base frecuency
3.1 GHz
2.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.6 GHz
5.8 GHz
Socket
BGA1364
LGA 1700
Cores/Threads
4/4
24/32
TDP
65 W
125 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
8x32/16x64+8x48/16x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
8x2048+4x4096 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
36864 kB
Date
June 2015
October 2022
Mean monothread perf.
51.43k points
129.15k points
Mean multithread perf.
194.2k points
1763.08k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i5-5675R
i9-13900K
Test#1 (Integers)
4.14k
9.77k (x2.36)
Test#2 (FP)
14.35k
24.52k (x1.71)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.94k
17.17k (x3.48)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.47k
21.37k (x3.9)
TOTAL
28.91k
72.83k (x2.52)
Multithread
i5-5675R
i9-13900K
Test#1 (Integers)
16.02k
145.21k (x9.06)
Test#2 (FP)
54.6k
444.95k (x8.15)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
18.69k
318.3k (x17.03)
Test#1 (Memory)
16.87k
27.2k (x1.61)
TOTAL
106.18k
935.66k (x8.81)
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i5-5675R
i9-13900K
Test#1 (Integers)
12.86k
31.93k (x2.48)
Test#2 (FP)
16.85k
31.54k (x1.87)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.19k
18.8k (x3.62)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.49k
20.82k (x3.79)
TOTAL
40.39k
103.09k (x2.55)
Multithread
i5-5675R
i9-13900K
Test#1 (Integers)
50.07k
522.07k (x10.43)
Test#2 (FP)
64.61k
584.17k (x9.04)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
19.84k
344.38k (x17.36)
Test#1 (Memory)
17.09k
25.36k (x1.48)
TOTAL
151.6k
1475.97k (x9.74)
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-5675R
i9-13900K
Test#1 (Integers)
12.88k
31.8k (x2.47)
Test#2 (FP)
18.27k
32.83k (x1.8)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.12k
18.37k (x3.59)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.45k
21.13k (x3.88)
TOTAL
41.72k
104.13k (x2.5)
Multithread
i5-5675R
i9-13900K
Test#1 (Integers)
49.91k
532.97k (x10.68)
Test#2 (FP)
70.3k
596.78k (x8.49)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
19.69k
342.96k (x17.42)
Test#1 (Memory)
16.92k
28.6k (x1.69)
TOTAL
156.83k
1501.31k (x9.57)
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-5675R
i9-13900K
Test#1 (Integers)
21.91k
58.6k (x2.67)
Test#2 (FP)
18.59k
33.29k (x1.79)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.2k
17.77k (x3.42)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.72k
19.49k (x3.41)
TOTAL
51.43k
129.15k (x2.51)
Multithread
i5-5675R
i9-13900K
Test#1 (Integers)
84.92k
804.04k (x9.47)
Test#2 (FP)
72.09k
613.45k (x8.51)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
20.13k
311.08k (x15.46)
Test#1 (Memory)
17.07k
34.5k (x2.02)
TOTAL
194.2k
1763.08k (x9.08)
Performance/W
i5-5675R
i9-13900K
Test#1 (Integers)
1306 points/W
6432 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1109 points/W
4908 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
310 points/W
2489 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
263 points/W
276 points/W
TOTAL
2988 points/W
14105 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-5675R
i9-13900K
Test#1 (Integers)
6087 points/GHz
10104 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5164 points/GHz
5739 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1445 points/GHz
3064 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1590 points/GHz
3360 points/GHz
TOTAL
14286 points/GHz
22268 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4