| | | | | | |

Core i5-5675R vs i9-13900HX


Description
The i5-5675R is based on Broadwell architecture while the i9-13900HX is based on Raptor Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-5675R gets a score of 194.2 k points while the i9-13900HX gets 885.4 k points.

Summarizing, the i9-13900HX is 4.6 times faster than the i5-5675R. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
40671
b0671
Core
Bradwell-H
Raptor Lake-HX
Architecture
Broadwell
Base frecuency
3.1 GHz
2.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.6 GHz
5.4 GHz
Socket
BGA1364
BGA 1964
Cores/Threads
4/4
24/32
TDP
65 W
55 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
8x32/16x64+8x48/16x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
8x2048/4x4096 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
36864 kB
Date
June 2015
January 2023
Mean monothread perf.
51.43k points
110.99k points
Mean multithread perf.
194.2k points
885.37k points

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i5-5675R
i9-13900HX
Test#1 (Integers)
12.86k
28.5k (x2.22)
Test#2 (FP)
16.85k
29.03k (x1.72)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.19k
11.57k (x2.23)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.49k
14.71k (x2.68)
TOTAL
40.39k
83.8k (x2.07)

Multithread

i5-5675R

i9-13900HX
Test#1 (Integers)
50.07k
196.13k (x3.92)
Test#2 (FP)
64.61k
222.91k (x3.45)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
19.84k
129.21k (x6.51)
Test#1 (Memory)
17.09k
24.26k (x1.42)
TOTAL
151.6k
572.52k (x3.78)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-5675R
i9-13900HX
Test#1 (Integers)
21.91k
53.97k (x2.46)
Test#2 (FP)
18.59k
28.92k (x1.56)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.2k
12.85k (x2.47)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.72k
15.25k (x2.67)
TOTAL
51.43k
110.99k (x2.16)

Multithread

i5-5675R

i9-13900HX
Test#1 (Integers)
84.92k
374.2k (x4.41)
Test#2 (FP)
72.09k
331.24k (x4.59)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
20.13k
164.06k (x8.15)
Test#1 (Memory)
17.07k
15.87k (x0.93)
TOTAL
194.2k
885.37k (x4.56)

Performance/W
i5-5675R
i9-13900HX
Test#1 (Integers)
1306 points/W
6804 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1109 points/W
6023 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
310 points/W
2983 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
263 points/W
289 points/W
TOTAL
2988 points/W
16098 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-5675R
i9-13900HX
Test#1 (Integers)
6087 points/GHz
9994 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5164 points/GHz
5355 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1445 points/GHz
2380 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1590 points/GHz
2825 points/GHz
TOTAL
14286 points/GHz
20553 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4