Core i5-5200U vs i7-920
Description
The i5-5200U is based on Broadwell architecture while the i7-920 is based on Nehalem Westmere.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-5200U gets a score of 32.6 k points while the i7-920 gets 45.3 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-920 is 1.4 times faster than the i5-5200U . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-5200U gets a score of 32.6 k points while the i7-920 gets 45.3 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-920 is 1.4 times faster than the i5-5200U . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
306d4
106a5
Core
Broadwell-U
Bloomfield
Base frecuency
2.2 GHz
2.667 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.7 GHz
2.993 GHz
Socket
LGA 1366
Cores/Threads
2 /4
4/8
TDP
15 W
130 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
32+32 kB
Cache L2
256 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
8192 kB
Date
March 2015
November 2008
Mean monothread perf.
31.81k points
16.33k points
Mean multithread perf.
68.69k points
47.2k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i5-5200U
i7-920
Test#1 (Integers)
2.67k
1.97k (x0.74)
Test#2 (FP)
9.37k
4.43k (x0.47)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.13k
2.75k (x0.88)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.59k
2.53k (x0.98)
TOTAL
17.76k
11.68k (x0.66)
Multithread
i5-5200U
i7-920
Test#1 (Integers)
4.16k
7.71k (x1.85)
Test#2 (FP)
19.01k
18.81k (x0.99)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.48k
13.76k (x2.12)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.96k
5.07k (x1.71)
TOTAL
32.61k
45.34k (x1.39)
Performance/W
i5-5200U
i7-920
Test#1 (Integers)
277 points/W
59 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1268 points/W
145 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
432 points/W
106 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
197 points/W
39 points/W
TOTAL
2174 points/W
349 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-5200U
i7-920
Test#1 (Integers)
988 points/GHz
657 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3469 points/GHz
1481 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1160 points/GHz
920 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
961 points/GHz
846 points/GHz
TOTAL
6577 points/GHz
3904 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4