| | | | | | |

Core i5-4670K vs i7-7560U


Description
The i5-4670K is based on Haswell architecture while the i7-7560U is based on Kaby Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-4670K gets a score of 140.2 k points while the i7-7560U gets 97.3 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-4670K is 1.4 times faster than the i7-7560U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
306c3
806e9
Core
Haswell
Kaby Lake-U
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.4 GHz
2.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.8 GHz
3.8 GHz
Socket
LGA 1150
BGA 1356
Cores/Threads
4/4
2/4
TDP
84 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
4096 kB
Date
June 2013
January 2017
Mean monothread perf.
42.25k points
48.16k points
Mean multithread perf.
140.18k points
97.27k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-4670K
i7-7560U
Test#1 (Integers)
21.79k
19.37k (x0.89)
Test#2 (FP)
11.49k
17.26k (x1.5)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.73k
3.78k (x0.8)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.25k
7.75k (x1.83)
TOTAL
42.25k
48.16k (x1.14)

Multithread

i5-4670K

i7-7560U
Test#1 (Integers)
75.9k
39.17k (x0.52)
Test#2 (FP)
40.88k
38.24k (x0.94)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
17.08k
8.9k (x0.52)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.32k
10.97k (x1.74)
TOTAL
140.18k
97.27k (x0.69)

Performance/W
i5-4670K
i7-7560U
Test#1 (Integers)
904 points/W
2611 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
487 points/W
2549 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
203 points/W
593 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
75 points/W
731 points/W
TOTAL
1669 points/W
6485 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-4670K
i7-7560U
Test#1 (Integers)
5735 points/GHz
5097 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3023 points/GHz
4543 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1244 points/GHz
994 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1117 points/GHz
2041 points/GHz
TOTAL
11120 points/GHz
12674 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4