Core i5-4460 vs Ryzen 3 3300U
Description
The i5-4460 is based on Haswell architecture while the 3300U is based on Zen+.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-4460 gets a score of 140.3 k points while the 3300U gets 139.6 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-4460 is 1 times faster than the 3300U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-4460 gets a score of 140.3 k points while the 3300U gets 139.6 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-4460 is 1 times faster than the 3300U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
306c3
810f81
Core
Haswell
Picasso
Base frecuency
3.2 GHz
2.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.4 GHz
3.5 GHz
Socket
LGA1150
BGA-FP5
Cores/Threads
4/4
4/4
TDP
84 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
4x64+4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
4096 kB
Date
May 2014
January 2019
Mean monothread perf.
39.53k points
40.81k points
Mean multithread perf.
140.27k points
139.56k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-4460
3300U
Test#1 (Integers)
19.84k
12k (x0.61)
Test#2 (FP)
10.86k
19.55k (x1.8)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.46k
4.43k (x0.99)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.39k
4.83k (x1.1)
TOTAL
39.53k
40.81k (x1.03)
Multithread
i5-4460
3300U
Test#1 (Integers)
75.08k
43.64k (x0.58)
Test#2 (FP)
42.36k
73.99k (x1.75)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
16.38k
17.03k (x1.04)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.45k
4.91k (x0.76)
TOTAL
140.27k
139.56k (x0.99)
Performance/W
i5-4460
3300U
Test#1 (Integers)
894 points/W
2909 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
504 points/W
4933 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
195 points/W
1135 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
77 points/W
327 points/W
TOTAL
1670 points/W
9304 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-4460
3300U
Test#1 (Integers)
5834 points/GHz
3430 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3193 points/GHz
5587 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1311 points/GHz
1266 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1290 points/GHz
1379 points/GHz
TOTAL
11628 points/GHz
11661 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4