Core i5-4300U vs Ryzen 9 3900X
Description
The i5-4300U is based on Haswell architecture while the 3900X is based on Zen 2.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-4300U gets a score of 64.8 k points while the 3900X gets 756.3 k points.
Summarizing, the 3900X is 11.7 times faster than the i5-4300U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-4300U gets a score of 64.8 k points while the 3900X gets 756.3 k points.
Summarizing, the 3900X is 11.7 times faster than the i5-4300U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
40651
870f10
Core
Haswell
Matisse
Base frecuency
1.9 GHz
3.8 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.9 GHz
4.6 GHz
Socket
BGA 1168
AM4
Cores/Threads
2/4
12/24
TDP
15 W
105 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
12x32+12x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
12x512 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
4x16384 kB
Date
January 2013
July 2019
Mean monothread perf.
32.18k points
72.51k points
Mean multithread perf.
64.79k points
756.3k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-4300U
3900X
Test#1 (Integers)
16.54k
16.73k (x1.01)
Test#2 (FP)
8.71k
24.74k (x2.84)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.69k
8.82k (x2.39)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.24k
22.22k (x6.87)
TOTAL
32.18k
72.51k (x2.25)
Multithread
i5-4300U
3900X
Test#1 (Integers)
31.64k
248.24k (x7.84)
Test#2 (FP)
21.59k
309.66k (x14.34)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.46k
140.01k (x16.55)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.09k
58.39k (x18.89)
TOTAL
64.79k
756.3k (x11.67)
Performance/W
i5-4300U
3900X
Test#1 (Integers)
2110 points/W
2364 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1439 points/W
2949 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
564 points/W
1333 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
206 points/W
556 points/W
TOTAL
4319 points/W
7203 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-4300U
3900X
Test#1 (Integers)
5705 points/GHz
3638 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3003 points/GHz
5377 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1274 points/GHz
1917 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1116 points/GHz
4831 points/GHz
TOTAL
11097 points/GHz
15763 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4