Core i5-3337U vs Phenom II X6 1035T
Description
The i5-3337U is based on Ivy Bridge architecture while the 1035T is based on K10.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-3337U gets a score of 31.7 k points while the 1035T gets 58.1 k points.
Summarizing, the 1035T is 1.8 times faster than the i5-3337U . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-3337U gets a score of 31.7 k points while the 1035T gets 58.1 k points.
Summarizing, the 1035T is 1.8 times faster than the i5-3337U . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
306a9
100fa0
Core
Ivy Bridge
Thuban
Base frecuency
1.8 GHz
2.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.7 GHz
3.1 GHz
Socket
BGA1023
Socket AM3
Cores/Threads
2 /2
6/6
TDP
17 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
32+32 kB
128 kB
Cache L2
256 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
6144 kB
Date
January 2013
May 2010
Mean monothread perf.
23.82k points
16.77k points
Mean multithread perf.
48.3k points
80.19k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i5-3337U
1035T
Test#1 (Integers)
2.55k
1.98k (x0.78)
Test#2 (FP)
7.24k
4.57k (x0.63)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.26k
2.57k (x0.79)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.37k
3.51k (x1.04)
TOTAL
16.42k
12.64k (x0.77)
Multithread
i5-3337U
1035T
Test#1 (Integers)
5.03k
11.86k (x2.36)
Test#2 (FP)
14.79k
27.4k (x1.85)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.37k
15.39k (x2.09)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.53k
3.46k (x0.76)
TOTAL
31.72k
58.11k (x1.83)
Performance/W
i5-3337U
1035T
Test#1 (Integers)
296 points/W
125 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
870 points/W
288 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
434 points/W
162 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
267 points/W
36 points/W
TOTAL
1866 points/W
612 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-3337U
1035T
Test#1 (Integers)
944 points/GHz
639 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2682 points/GHz
1474 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1206 points/GHz
830 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1248 points/GHz
1134 points/GHz
TOTAL
6080 points/GHz
4076 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4