| | | | | | |

Core i5-2410M vs Xeon E5472


Description
The i5-2410M is based on Sandy Bridge architecture while the E5472 is based on Core.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-2410M gets a score of 36.9 k points while the E5472 gets 48.6 k points.

Summarizing, the E5472 is 1.3 times faster than the i5-2410M . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
206a7
10676
Core
Sandy Bridge
Harpertown
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.3 GHz
3 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.9 GHz
3 GHz
Socket
Socket G2 (988B)
LGA-771
Cores/Threads
2/2
4/4
TDP
35 W
80 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
2x6144 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
kB
Date
February 2011
November 2007
Mean monothread perf.
20.1k points
16.62k points
Mean multithread perf.
38.68k points
48.62k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i5-2410M
E5472
Test#1 (Integers)
2.38k
2.29k (x0.96)
Test#2 (FP)
6.6k
5.85k (x0.89)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.48k
2.44k (x0.7)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.16k
4.81k (x1.52)
TOTAL
15.62k
15.39k (x0.99)

Multithread

i5-2410M

E5472
Test#1 (Integers)
5.49k
9.06k (x1.65)
Test#2 (FP)
14.39k
23.09k (x1.6)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.39k
9.7k (x1.16)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.09k
2.53k (x0.82)
TOTAL
31.35k
44.38k (x1.42)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i5-2410M
E5472
Test#1 (Integers)
7.98k
2.88k (x0.36)
Test#2 (FP)
6.55k
6.36k (x0.97)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.28k
2.55k (x0.78)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.7k
4.83k (x1.79)
TOTAL
20.52k
16.62k (x0.81)

Multithread

i5-2410M

E5472
Test#1 (Integers)
13.66k
11.19k (x0.82)
Test#2 (FP)
13.17k
24.85k (x1.89)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.05k
10.04k (x1.42)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.02k
2.54k (x0.84)
TOTAL
36.9k
48.62k (x1.32)

Performance/W
i5-2410M
E5472
Test#1 (Integers)
390 points/W
140 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
376 points/W
311 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
202 points/W
125 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
86 points/W
32 points/W
TOTAL
1054 points/W
608 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-2410M
E5472
Test#1 (Integers)
2752 points/GHz
961 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2258 points/GHz
2119 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1132 points/GHz
850 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
933 points/GHz
1610 points/GHz
TOTAL
7075 points/GHz
5539 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4